Cited by 3,761Gamma-ray bursts and supernovaeStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesNuclear physics research studies

The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis

Woosley, S. E., Weaver, Thomas A.·1995·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

The nucleosynthetic yield of isotopes lighter than A = 66 (zinc) is determined for a grid of stellar masses and metallicities including stars of 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 19, 20, 22, 25, 30, 35, and 40 Msun and metallicities Z = 0, l0-4, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 times solar (a slightly reduced mass grid is employed for nonsolar metallicities). Altogether 78 different model supernova explosions are calculated. In each case nucleosynthesis has already been determined for 200 isotopes in each of 600 to 1200 zones of the presupernova star, including the effects of time dependent convection. Here each star is exploded using a piston to give a specified final kinetic energy at infinity (typically 1.2 × 1051 ergs), and the explosive modifications to the nucleosynthesis, including the effects of neutrino irradiation, determined. A single value of the critical 12C(α,γ) 16O reaction rate corresponding to 8(300 keV) = 170 keV barns is used in all calculations. The synthesis of each isotope is discussed along with its sensitivity to model parameters. In each case, the final mass of the collapsed remnant is also determined and often found not to correspond to the location of the piston (typically the edge of the iron core), but to a "mass cut" farther out. This mass cut is sensitive not only to the explosion energy, but also to the presupernova structure, stellar mass, and the metallicity. Unless the explosion mechanism, for unknown reasons, provides a much larger characteristic energy in more massive stars, it appears likely that stars larger than about 30 Msun will experience considerable reimplosion of heavy elements following the initial launch of a successful shock. While such explosions will produce a viable, bright Type II supernova light curve, lacking perhaps the radioactive tail, they will have dramatically reduced yields of heavy elements and may leave black hole remnants of up to 10 and more solar masses. The production of black holes may be particularly favored for stars of low metallicity, both because of their more compact structure and reduced mass loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/192237

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Core collapse supernovae and stellar winds from Wolf Rayet stars are predicted to release F-enriched material into the ISM, alongside AGB stars.

    “Core collapse supernovae (Woosley & Weaver 1995) and stellar winds from Wolf Rayet stars (Meynet & Arnould 2000) are both predicted to release F-enriched material into the ISM, alongside AGB stars (Renda et al. 2004).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
1995-11
Volume
101
Pages
181
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2047798125
Cited by
3,761
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 147 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 161 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 146 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 132
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
Keywords
massive stars, supernova nucleosynthesis, supernova yields, 12C(α,γ)16O reaction rate, black hole remnants, Type II supernovae, stellar metallicity, stellar mass, time-dependent convection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review