The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Abstract
The nucleosynthetic yield of isotopes lighter than A = 66 (zinc) is determined for a grid of stellar masses and metallicities including stars of 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 19, 20, 22, 25, 30, 35, and 40 Msun and metallicities Z = 0, l0-4, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 times solar (a slightly reduced mass grid is employed for nonsolar metallicities). Altogether 78 different model supernova explosions are calculated. In each case nucleosynthesis has already been determined for 200 isotopes in each of 600 to 1200 zones of the presupernova star, including the effects of time dependent convection. Here each star is exploded using a piston to give a specified final kinetic energy at infinity (typically 1.2 × 1051 ergs), and the explosive modifications to the nucleosynthesis, including the effects of neutrino irradiation, determined. A single value of the critical 12C(α,γ) 16O reaction rate corresponding to 8(300 keV) = 170 keV barns is used in all calculations. The synthesis of each isotope is discussed along with its sensitivity to model parameters. In each case, the final mass of the collapsed remnant is also determined and often found not to correspond to the location of the piston (typically the edge of the iron core), but to a "mass cut" farther out. This mass cut is sensitive not only to the explosion energy, but also to the presupernova structure, stellar mass, and the metallicity. Unless the explosion mechanism, for unknown reasons, provides a much larger characteristic energy in more massive stars, it appears likely that stars larger than about 30 Msun will experience considerable reimplosion of heavy elements following the initial launch of a successful shock. While such explosions will produce a viable, bright Type II supernova light curve, lacking perhaps the radioactive tail, they will have dramatically reduced yields of heavy elements and may leave black hole remnants of up to 10 and more solar masses. The production of black holes may be particularly favored for stars of low metallicity, both because of their more compact structure and reduced mass loss.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Core collapse supernovae and stellar winds from Wolf Rayet stars are predicted to release F-enriched material into the ISM, alongside AGB stars.
“Core collapse supernovae (Woosley & Weaver 1995) and stellar winds from Wolf Rayet stars (Meynet & Arnould 2000) are both predicted to release F-enriched material into the ISM, alongside AGB stars (Renda et al. 2004).”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Woosley & Weaver 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cole, S., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., & Frenk, C. S. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x · Cited by 1,952 · see citing works
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
“Core collapse supernovae (Woosley & Weaver 1995) and stellar winds from Wolf Rayet stars (Meynet & Arnould 2000) are both predicted to release F-enriched material into the ISM, alongside AGB stars (Renda et al. 2004).”
BackgroundThe Isotopic Abundances of Magnesium in Stars
Gay, P. L., & Lambert, D. L. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308653 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Chemical Evolution of Mg Isotopes versus the Time Variation of the Fine Structure Constant
Ashenfelter, T., Mathews, G. J., & Olive, K. A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.041102 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
On variations in the fine-structure constant and stellar pollution of quasar absorption systems
Fenner, Y., Murphy, M. T., & Gibson, B. K. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08781.x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 101
- Pages
- 181
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2047798125
- Cited by
- 3,761
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 147 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 161 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 146 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 132
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
- Keywords
- massive stars, supernova nucleosynthesis, supernova yields, 12C(α,γ)16O reaction rate, black hole remnants, Type II supernovae, stellar metallicity, stellar mass, time-dependent convection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review