The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stellar and wind parameters of Galactic O-stars: The influence of line-blocking/blanketing
Open accessAbstract
We have re-analyzed the Galactic O-star sample from [CITE] by means of line-blanketed NLTE model atmospheres in order to investigate the influence of line-blocking/blanketing on the derived parameters. The analysis has been carried out by fitting the photospheric and wind lines from H and He. In most cases we obtained a good fit, but we have also found certain inconsistencies which are probably related to a still inadequate treatment of the wind structure. These inconsistencies comprise the line cores of H\gamma and H\beta in supergiants (the synthetic profiles are too weak when the mass-loss rate is determined by matching H\alpha) and the “generalized dilution effect” (cf. Voels et al. 1989) which is still present in He i 4471 of cooler supergiants and giants. Compared to pure H/He plane-parallel models we found a decrease in effective temperatures which is largest at earliest spectral types and for supergiants (with a maximum shift of roughly 8000 K). This finding is explained by the fact that line-blanketed models of hot stars have photospheric He ionization fractions similar to those from unblanketed models at higher Teff and higher . Consequently, any line-blanketed analysis based on the He ionization equilibrium results in lower Teff-values along with a reduction of either or helium abundance (if the reduction of is prohibited by the Balmer line wings). Stellar radii and mass-loss rates, on the other hand, remain more or less unaffected by line-blanketing. We have calculated “new” spectroscopic masses and compared them with previous results. Although the former mass discrepancy [CITE] becomes significantly reduced, a systematic trend for masses below 50 seems to remain: The spectroscopically derived values are smaller than the “evolutionary masses” by roughly 10 . Additionally, a significant fraction of our sample stars stays over-abundant in He, although the actual values were found to be lower than previously determined. Also the wind-momentum luminosity relation (WLR) changes because of lower luminosities and almost unmodified wind-momentum rates. Compared to previous results, the separation of the WLR as a function of luminosity class is still present but now the WLR for giants/dwarfs is consistent with theoretical predictions. We argue that the derived mass-loss rates of stars with H\alpha in emission are affected by clumping in the lower wind region. If the predictions from different and independent theoretical simulations (Vink et al. 2000; Pauldrach et al. 2003; Puls et al. 2003a) that the WLR should be independent of luminosity class were correct, a typical clumping factor should be derived by “unifying” the different WLRs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A [ITAL]Hipparcos[/ITAL] Census of the Nearby OB Associations
de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., & Blaauw, A. (1999) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300682 · Cited by 1,317
Synthetic properties of starburst galaxies
Leitherer, C., & Heckman, T. M. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192112 · Cited by 672 · cited 1×
“…parameters depending on evolutionary stage and environment) are crucial for the chemical and dynamical evolution of galaxies through their input of energy, momentum, and nuclear processed material into the interstellar medium (e.g., Leitherer & Heckman 1995; Silich & Tenorio-Tagle 2001; Oey 2003).”
Background
Cited by
A new calibration of stellar parameters of Galactic O stars
Martins, F., Schaerer, D., & Hillier, D. J. (2005) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042386 · Cited by 1,120
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Smith, N. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025 · Cited by 1,042
“Based on unifying Hα meaurements with the theoretical mind momentum 8 Smith relation, both Repolust et al. (2004) and Markova et al. (2004) found fcl=5, or a mass-loss raduction by 2.3.1 Puls et al. (2006, 2008) and others have discussed that the larger mass-loss rate reduction of 10 found by…”
BackgroundInfluentialLoeb, A. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07684.x · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Repolust, T., Puls, J., & Herrero, A.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 415
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 349-376
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W1983806448
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stellar and wind parameters of Galactic O-stars: The influence of line-blocking/blanketing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20034594
- The paper
- Repolust, T., Puls, J., & Herrero, A. (2004). Stellar and wind parameters of Galactic O-stars: The influence of line-blocking/blanketing. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20034594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.