The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly-excited CO emission in APM 08279+5255 at z = 3.9
Open accessAbstract
We report the detection of the CO 4–3, 6–5, 9–8, 10–9, and 11–10 lines in the Broad Absorption Line quasar APM 08279+5255 at using the IRAM 30 m telescope. We also present IRAM PdBI high spatial resolution observations of the CO 4–3 and 9–8 lines, and of the 1.4 mm dust radiation as well as an improved spectrum of the HCN(5–4) line. Unlike CO in other QSO host galaxies, the CO line SED of APM 08279+5255 rises up to the CO(10–9) transition. The line fluxes in the CO ladder and the dust continuum fluxes are best fit by a two component model, a “cold” component at ~ K with a high density of n(H2) = 1105 cm-3, and a “warm”, ~ K component with a density of 1104 cm-3. We show that IR pumping via the 14 bending mode of HCN is the most likely channel for the HCN excitation. From our models we find, that the CO(1–0) emission is dominated by the dense gas component which implies that the CO conversion factor is higher than usually assumed for high-z galaxies with 5 (K km s-1 pc2)-1. Using brightness temperature arguments, the results from our high-resolution mapping, and lens models from the literature, we argue that the molecular lines and the dust continuum emission arise from a very compact (r ≈ 100-300 pc), highly gravitationally magnified () region surrounding the central AGN. Part of the difference relative to other high-z QSOs may therefore be due to the configuration of the gravitational lens, which gives us a high-magnification zoom right into the central 200-pc radius of APM 08279+5255 where IR pumping plays a significant role for the excitation of the molecular lines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Cited by
Cool Gas in High-Redshift Galaxies
Carilli, C. L., & Walter, F. (2013) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140953 · Cited by 1,107
Self-citationDusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Cool outflows in galaxies and their implications
Veilleux, S., Maiolino, R., Bolatto, A. D., & Aalto, S. (2020) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-019-0121-9 · Cited by 466
An ALMA [C ii] Survey of 27 Quasars at z > 5.94
Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., Bañados, E., Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C., Fan, X., Farina, E. P., Mazzucchelli, C., Riechers, D., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa · Cited by 308
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiß, A., Downes, D., Neri, R., Walter, F., Henkel, C., Wilner, D. J., Wagg, J., & Wiklind, T.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2007-02-27
- Volume
- 467
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 955-969
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W1995262538
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly-excited CO emission in APM 08279+5255 at z = 3.9. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20066117
- The paper
- Weiß, A., Downes, D., Neri, R., Walter, F., Henkel, C., Wilner, D. J., Wagg, J., & Wiklind, T. (2007). Highly-excited CO emission in APM 08279+5255 at z = 3.9. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20066117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.