The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An ALMA [C ii] Survey of 27 Quasars at z > 5.94
Open accessAbstract
We present a survey of the [C ii] 158 μ m line and underlying far-infrared (FIR) dust continuum emission in a sample of 27 quasars using the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) at resolution. The [C ii] line was significantly detected (at -σ) in 23 sources (85%). We find typical line luminosities of , and an average line width of ∼385 . The [C ii]-to-far-infrared luminosity ratios ([C ii]/FIR) in our sources span one order of magnitude, highlighting a variety of conditions in the star-forming medium. Four quasar host galaxies are clearly resolved in their [C ii] emission on a few kpc scales. Basic estimates of the dynamical masses of the host galaxies give masses between 2 × 10 10 and 2 × 10 11 , i.e., more than an order of magnitude below what is expected from local scaling relations, given the available limits on the masses of the central black holes ( , assuming Eddington-limited accretion). In stacked ALMA [C ii] spectra of individual sources in our sample, we find no evidence of a deviation from a single Gaussian profile. The quasar luminosity does not strongly correlate with either the [C ii] luminosity or equivalent width. This survey (with typical on-source integration times of 8 minutes) showcases the unparalleled sensitivity of ALMA at millimeter wavelengths, and offers a unique reference sample for the study of the first massive galaxies in the universe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · Cited by 10,583
Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies
Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. (2013) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 · Cited by 4,196
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 3×
“For the dust-based SFR estimates, we follow Kennicutt & Evans (2012): = ´ - - ( ) M L L SFR yr 1.49 10 .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Relation between Black Hole Mass, Bulge Mass, and Near-Infrared Luminosity
Marconi, A., & Hunt, L. K. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375804 · Cited by 1,708
On the Black Hole Mass-Bulge Mass Relation
Hring, N., & Rix, H.-W. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383567 · Cited by 1,626
Self-citationA luminous quasar at a redshift of z = 7.085
Mortlock, D. J., Warren, S. J., Venemans, B. P., Patel, M., Hewett, P. C., McMahon, R. G., Simpson, C., Theuns, T., Gonzáles-Solares, E. A., Adamson, A., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10159 · Cited by 1,494
Self-citationCool Gas in High-Redshift Galaxies
Carilli, C. L., & Walter, F. (2013) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140953 · Cited by 1,107
Self-citationAn 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at a redshift of 7.5
Bañados, E., Venemans, B. P., Mazzucchelli, C., Farina, E. P., Walter, F., Wang, F., Decarli, R., Stern, D., Fan, X., Davies, F. B., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25180 · Cited by 1,102
Self-citationSilva, L., Granato, G. L., Bressan, A., & Danese, L. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306476 · Cited by 1,029
Tacconi, L. J., Neri, R., Genzel, R., Combes, F., Bolatto, A., Cooper, M. C., Wuyts, S., Bournaud, F., Burkert, A., Comerford, J., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/74 · Cited by 941
Cited by
The Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes
Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 · Cited by 665
Metadata
- Authors
- Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., Bañados, E., Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C., Fan, X., Farina, E. P., Mazzucchelli, C., Riechers, D., Rix, H.-W., Strauss, M. A., Wang, R., & Yang, Y.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2018-02-15
- Volume
- 854
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2783408908
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 17.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An ALMA [C ii] Survey of 27 Quasars at z > 5.94. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa
- The paper
- Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., Bañados, E., Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C., Fan, X., Farina, E. P., Mazzucchelli, C., Riechers, D., Rix, H.-W., Strauss, M. A., Wang, R., & Yang, Y. (2018). An ALMA [C ii] Survey of 27 Quasars at z > 5.94. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
