Cited by 9Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Ground-based variability surveys towards Centaurus A: worthwhile or not?

Open access
de Jong, J. T. A., Kuijken, K. H., Héraudeau, P.·2008·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Context.Difference imaging has proven to be a powerful technique for detecting and monitoring the variability of unresolved stellar sources in M 31. Using this technique in surveys of galaxies outside the Local Group could have many interesting applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20078378

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LSST data products will enable gravitational microlensing studies in the Milky Way, the Local Group, and beyond.

    “Gravitational microlensing in the Milky Way ( see Han 2008 ) , as well as in the Local Group and beyond ( de Jong et al. 2008 ) .”

    From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as de Jong et al. 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. de Jong, J. T. A. 2005, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jong, J. T. A., Kuijken, K. H., & Héraudeau, P.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2007-12-12
Volume
478
Issue
3
Pages
755-762
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2166102130
Cited by
9
References
29
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Centaurus A, image subtraction, active galactic nuclei, external galaxies, stellar variability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review