The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z~ 2: II. Superdense passive galaxies: how did they form and evolve?
Abstract
Aims. The aim of this work is to investigate the physical, structural and evolutionary properties of old, passive galaxies at z > 1.4 and to place new constraints on massive galaxy formation and evolution. Methods: We combine ultradeep optical spectroscopy from the GMASS project (Galaxy Mass Assembly ultradeep Spectroscopic Survey) with GOODS multi-band (optical to mid-infrared) photometry and HST imaging to study a sample of spectroscopically identified passive galaxies at 1.39 < z < 1.99 selected from Spitzer Space Selescope imaging at 4.5 mum. Results: A stacked spectrum with an equivalent integration time of ~500 h was obtained and compared with libraries of synthetic stellar population spectra. The stacked spectrum is publicly released. The spectral and photometric SED properties indicate very weak or absent star formation, moderately old stellar ages of ≈1 Gyr (for solar metallicity) and stellar masses in the range of 1010-11 Mo, thus implying that the major star formation and assembly processes for these galaxies occurred at z > 2. No X-ray emission was found neither from individual galaxies nor from a stacking analysis of the sample. Only one galaxy shows a marginal detection at 24 mum. These galaxies have morphologies that are predominantly compact and spheroidal. However, their sizes (R_e≲1 kpc) are much smaller than those of spheroids in the present-day Universe. Their stellar mass surface densities are consequently higher by ≈1 dex if compared to spheroids at z≈0 with the same mass. Their rest-frame B-band surface brightness scales with the effective radius, but the offset with respect to the surface brightness of the local Kormendy relation is too large to be explained by simple passive evolution. At z≈1, a larger fraction of passive galaxies follows the z≈0 size-mass relation. Superdense relics with R_e≈1 kpc are extremely rare at z≈0 with respect to z > 1, and absent if Re < 1 kpc. Because of the similar sizes and mass densities, we suggest that the superdense passive galaxies at 1 < z < 2 are the remnants of the powerful starbursts occurring in submillimeter-selected galaxies at z > 2. The results are compared with theoretical models and the main implications discussed in the framework of massive galaxy formation and evolution. Based on the ESO VLT Large Program 173.A-0687.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SExtractor: Software for source extraction
Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. (1996) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series · doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 · Cited by 10,866
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x · Cited by 10,500
The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.
Salpeter, E. E. (1955) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145971 · Cited by 8,697
On the variation of the initial mass function
Kroupa, P. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · Cited by 7,499
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass FunctionPreprint
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Cited by 4,970
Star Formation in Galaxies Along the Hubble Sequence
Kennicutt, R. C., & Words, K. (1998) · Cited by 3,712
Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/340952 · Cited by 2,783
Stellar masses and star formation histories for 105galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Simon White, D. M., Charlot, S., Tremonti, C., Brinchmann, J., Bruzual, G., Peng, E. W., Seibert, M., Bernardi, M., et al. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x · Cited by 2,417
Maraston, C. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x · Cited by 1,907 · cited 4×
“…are systematically higher by 0.04 dex than those derived assuming the Chabrier IMF, and this difference was subtracted from the masses derived with Maraston (2005) models (using Kroupa IMF), in order to allow a homogeneous comparison with the masses derived using the Bruzual & Charlot (2003) and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial Results from Optical and Near-Infrared Imaging
Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., Dickinson, M., Alexander, D. M., Bauer, F. E., Bergeron, J., Biagetti, C., Brandt, W. N., Casertano, S., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/379232 · Cited by 1,678
Self-citation
Cited by
Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Koo, D. C., Lai, K., Lotz, J. M., Lucas, R. A., McGrath, E. J., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36 · Cited by 2,052
Self-citationTHE SINS SURVEY: SINFONI INTEGRAL FIELD SPECTROSCOPY OF z∼ 2 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES
Förster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., Bouché, N., Cresci, G., Davies, R., Buschkamp, P., Shapiro, K., Tacconi, L. J., Hicks, E. K. S., Genel, S., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/2/1364 · Cited by 1,113
Self-citationAN ULTRA-DEEP NEAR-INFRARED SPECTRUM OF A COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXY AT z= 2.2
Kriek, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Labbé, I., Franx, M., Illingworth, G. D., Marchesini, D., & Quadri, R. F. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/221 · Cited by 992
MINOR MERGERS AND THE SIZE EVOLUTION OF ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES
Naab, T., Johansson, P. H., & Ostriker, J. P. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/l178 · Cited by 979
Modeling the Panchromatic Spectral Energy Distributions of Galaxies
Conroy, C. (2013) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017 · Cited by 959
Metadata
- Authors
- Cimatti, A., Cassata, P., Pozzetti, L., Kurk, J., Mignoli, M., Renzini, A., Daddi, E., Bolzonella, M., Brusa, M., Rodighiero, G., Dickinson, M., Franceschini, A., Zamorani, G., Berta, S., Rosati, P., & Halliday, C.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2008-01-09
- Volume
- 482
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-42
- ISSN
- 0004-6361
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2150942185
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 21.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z~ 2: II. Superdense passive galaxies: how did they form and evolve? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20078739
- The paper
- Cimatti, A., Cassata, P., Pozzetti, L., Kurk, J., Mignoli, M., Renzini, A., Daddi, E., Bolzonella, M., Brusa, M., Rodighiero, G., Dickinson, M., Franceschini, A., Zamorani, G., Berta, S., Rosati, P., & Halliday, C. (2008). GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z~ 2: II. Superdense passive galaxies: how did they form and evolve? Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20078739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.