X-ray induced mass loss effects on exoplanets orbiting dM stars
Open accessAbstract
Aims.We study the influence of the X-ray luminosity distribution of dM stars on mass loss from planets on close-in orbits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High levels of energetic radiation lead to significant planetary atmospheric evaporation.
“Ultimately, high levels of energetic radiation lead to significant planetary atmospheric evaporation, as discussed by, e.g., Lammer et al. (2003), Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003), and Penz & Micela (2008).”
From ABOUT EXOBIOLOGY: THE CASE FOR DWARF K STARS (2016) · cites this paper as Penz & Micela (2008)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Adams, E. R., Seager, S., & Elkins-Tanton, L. 2007, ApJ, accepted [arXiv:0710.4941] · arXiv
- Cox, A. N. 2001, Allen's astrophysical quantities (Springer)
- Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., Barman, T., et al. 2007, A&A, submitted [arXiv:0707.3809] · arXiv
- Dorren, J. D., & Guinan, E. F. 1994, in The Sun as a Variable Star: Solar and Stellar Irradiance Variations, ed. J. M. Pap, C. Frolich, H. S. Hudson, & S. Solanki, Proc. IAU Colloq., 143, 206
- Johnson, J. A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, accepted [arXiv:0707.2409] · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HYDROGEN GREENHOUSE PLANETS BEYOND THE HABITABLE ZONE
Pierrehumbert, R., & Gaidos, E. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/734/1/l13 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
ABOUT EXOBIOLOGY: THE CASE FOR DWARF K STARS
Cuntz, M., & Guinan, E. F. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/1/79 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“Ultimately, high levels of energetic radiation lead to significant planetary atmospheric evaporation, as discussed by, e.g., Lammer et al. (2003), Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003), and Penz & Micela (2008).”
Background
- Authors
- Penz, T., & Micela, G.
- Affiliations
- Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo (IT)
- ORCID
- Micela, G.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2007-12-18
- Volume
- 479
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 579-584
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2143863276
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Keywords
- exoplanets, dM stars, M dwarfs, close-in planets, X-ray luminosity distribution, planetary atmospheres
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
