Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitrogen rhizodeposition of legumes. A review

Open access
Fustec, Joëlle, Lesuffleur, Fabien, Mahieu, Stéphanie, Cliquet, Jean-Bernard·2010·Agronomy for Sustainable Development

Abstract

Because nitrogen is one of the major elements limiting growth of plants in agrosystems, large amounts of N fertilisers have been used in the second half of the twentieth century. Chemical fertilisers have contributed to increasing crop yields and food supply, but they have induced environmental damage such as nitrate pollution and wasting fossil fuel. The use of legumes grown in rotations or intercropping is now regarded as an alternative and sustainable way of introducing N into lower input agrosystems. Here we review agricultural practices, measurement methods and biological pathways involved in N cycling. We show that plant roots interact intimately with soil microflora to convert the most abundant but relatively inert form of N, atmospheric N 2 , into biological substrates available for growth of other plants, through two consecutive processes; namely, N 2 fixation and N rhizodeposition. In intercropping, companion plants benefit from biological fixation by legumes and subsequent transfer of N from legumes to non-legumes. This transfer from legumes to the release of N compounds by legume roots, a process named rhizodeposition, then the uptake by the companion crop. The two main rhizodeposition pathways are (i) decomposition and decay of nodules and root cells, and (ii) exudation of soluble N compounds by plant roots. The contribution of root N and rhizodeposited N to the soil-N pool is difficult to measure, particularly in the field. Firstly, root N is often underestimated because root recovery is problematic. Second, assessment of N rhizodeposition is challenging. Several 15 N labelling methods have been performed for different legume species. Rhizodeposition of N, as a percentage of total plant N, varied from 4 to 71%. The high variability of the results illustrates the need for more studies of the environmental and genetic factors influencing the amount of N rhizodeposits released by legumes under field conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/agro/2009003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Fustec, J., Lesuffleur, F., Mahieu, S., & Cliquet, J.-B.
Venue
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Published
2010-03
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
57-66
ISSN
  • 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1774-0746
OpenAlex
W1979109409
Cited by
461
References
50
FWCI
18.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen rhizodeposition of legumes. A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/agro/2009003
The paper
Fustec, J., Lesuffleur, F., Mahieu, S., & Cliquet, J.-B. (2010). Nitrogen rhizodeposition of legumes. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.