Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of grass feeding systems on ruminant meat colour and flavour. A review

Open access
Priolo, Alessandro, Micol, Didier, Agabriel, Jacques·2001·Animal Research

Abstract

Grass feeding has been reported to affect several meat quality characteristics, in particular colour and flavour.In this paper we have reviewed some differences in meat colour and flavour between ruminants fed concentrates and animals allowed to graze pasture.The possible factors influencing the differences have been also examined.We have examined a total of 35 experiments which report the effect of pasture vs concentrate finishing systems on beef meat colour.Meat from cattle raised on pasture is reported to be darker than meat from animals raised on concentrates if measured by objective (P < 0.001) as well as subjective (P < 0.05) methods.Several factors, not a specific one are responsible for this difference, variations in ultimate-pH and in intramuscular fat content between animals finished at pasture and those finished on concentrates, seem to play a major role.Diet also affects meat flavour in both sheep and cattle but the components involved seem to be different.In sheep pastoral flavour is mostly determined by the branched-chain fatty acids and 3-methylindole (skatole).An important role seems to be played also by some products of oxidation of linolenic acid and its derivates.In cattle the role of skatole seems to be less important than sheep because of the lack of the branched-chain fatty acids.The pastoral flavour seems to be mostly determined by products of oxidation of linolenic acid and its derivates which derives substantially from grass.grass feeding / meat colour / meat flavour / ruminants Résumé -Effets d'une alimentation à base d'herbe sur la couleur et la flaveur de la viande de ruminants.L'alimentation à base d'herbe est souvent proposée comme un facteur pouvant influer sur la qualité de la viande et notamment ses caractéristiques de couleur et de flaveur.Dans cette revue bibliographique sont regroupées des différences de couleur et de flaveur observées entre viandes de bœufs ou d'agneaux provenant d'animaux alimentés au pâturage ou avec des régimes concentrés (souvent à base de maïs) et les rares éléments d'explication.L'analyse de la couleur de la viande bovine repose sur 35 essais différents.La viande provenant des animaux qui pâturent est plus sombre, quelle que soit la méthode de mesure, objective (luminosité L* mesurée au photomètre P < 0,001) ou subjective (critère visuel P < 0,05).Parmi les principaux facteurs pouvant expliquer cette différence, se trouvent les variations du pH ultime et celles du gras intramusculaire.Le régime alimentaire affecte aussi la flaveur des viandes de bœuf et d'agneau, mais les facteurs impliqués semblent différer entre

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/animres:2001125

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Priolo, A., Micol, D., & Agabriel, J.
Venue
Animal Research
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2001-05
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
185-200
ISSN
  • 0003-424X (ISSN-L)
  • 1297-9651
OpenAlex
W2038423122
Cited by
460
References
0
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of grass feeding systems on ruminant meat colour and flavour. A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/animres:2001125
The paper
Priolo, A., Micol, D., & Agabriel, J. (2001). Effects of grass feeding systems on ruminant meat colour and flavour. A review. Animal Research. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres%3A2001125

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.