Cited by 59Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactConsumer behavior in food and healthConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

‘Less but better’ meat is a sustainability message in need of clarity

Resare Sahlin, Kajsa, Röös, Elin, Gordon, Line J.·2020·Nature Food

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43016-020-00140-5

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is growing scientific consensus that Western or high-income consumers must reduce meat intake to lower the environmental impact of diets.

    “There is growing scientific consensus that Western or highincome consumers must reduce meat intake to lower the environmental impact of diets (Resare Sahlin et al. 2020).”
  • There are known trade-offs between sustainability aspects in extensive and improved meat production.

    “but there are known trade-offs between sustainability aspects in extensive and improved meat production (Resare Sahlin et al. 2020).”
  • This reinforces the inherent connection between 'less' and 'better'-choosing a more sustainable meat option must go hand-in-hand with reduced intake in order to transform trade-offs between sustainability areas into synergies.

    “This reinforces the inherent connection between ' less ' and ' better '-choosing a more sustainable meat option must go hand-in-hand with reduced intake in order to transform trade-offs between sustainability areas into synergies (Resare Sahlin et al. 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Resare Sahlin, K., Röös, E., & Gordon, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE)
Venue
Nature Food
Published
2020-09-15
Volume
1
Issue
9
Pages
520-522
ISSN
2662-1355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125361990
Cited by
59
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Food (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
meat consumption, sustainability, customer communication, meat production, dietary recommendations, sustainability messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review