Cited by 2Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersOccupational Health and Safety ManagementFacilities and Workplace Management

Ergonomic Workspace Design to Reduce the Risk of Musculoskeletal Disorders

Open access
Septiani, Winnie, Angelika, Vivian, Rahmawati, Novia·2024·E3S Web of Conferences

Abstract

Office activities were closely tied to document handling and computer interaction. Based on initial identification with the Nordic Body Map, MSDs (Musculoskeletal Disorders) complaints were identified in the shoulders, wrists, waist, buttocks, and back. This study aimed to offer recommendations for enhancing office workstations to minimize the risk of MSDs. The methods used are ROSA to identify employee work postures, product design to provide proposed work facilities, 5S for document organization, and a Radar Chart for evaluation. Initial identification shows the problems that exist in work facilities, workspace layout, and work environment factors. The initial identification of the workspace with Radar Chart also showed a poor score on 5 aspects of Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, and Shitsuke with an average of 41.75. The proposed intervention is the improvement of ergonomic tables and chairs, structuring documents by applying 5S aspects, and improving the layout of the workspace. The proposed improvements were then evaluated again using the Office 5S Audit Checklist and Radar Chart so that after the ergonomics intervention, the Radar Chart value became 90.75 (excellent) and the 5S aspects (Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, and Shitsuke) increased. The results of this improvement can be expected to overcome the risk of MSDS problems in the lower neck, buttocks, back, and waist and the resulting ergonomic, organized, and efficient workstations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/e3sconf/202450003045

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. E. I. Baba, D. D. Baba, and J. Oborah, "Effect of Office Ergonomics on Office Workers' Productivity in the Polytechnics, Nigeria," J. Educ. Pract., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 67-75, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.7176/JEP/12-3-10. · DOI
  2. E. Terek, Z. Sajfert, K. Zoric, and S. Isakov, "Positive outcomes of office ergonomics in terms of higher productivity," J. Eng. Manag. Compet., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53-57, 2014, doi: 10.5937/jemc1401053T. · DOI
  3. A. Mazloumi, S. Samiei, and R. Pourbabaki, "Experimental Study on the Effect of monitor height on Eye Indices Influencing Eye Discomfort among VDT Workers," J. Health Saf. Work, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 54-66, 2022.
  4. N. Yokoi et al., "Importance of Tear Film Instability in Dry Eye Disease in Office Workers Using Visual Display Terminals: The Osaka Study," Am. J. Ophthalmol., vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 748-754, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.12.019. · DOI
  5. A. Dinar, I. H. Susilowati, A. Azwar, K. Indriyani, and M. Wirawan, "Analysis of Ergonomic Risk Factors in Relation to Musculoskeletal Disorder Symptoms in Office Workers," in KnE Life Sciences, Jun. 2018, pp. 16-29. doi: 10.18502/kls.v4i5.2536. · DOI
  6. E. Pertiwi and I. Sujana, "Usulan Perbaikan Postur Kerja Menggunakan Nordic Body Map (NBM) dan Quick Exposure Check (QEC) pada Pekerja Bagian Pemasangan Jok Kursi," INTEGRATE Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2022.
  7. M. Agustin, H. Tannady, O. Ferdian, and S. I. G. Alamsjah, "Posture Analysis Using Nordic Body Map and Rapid Office Strain Assessment Methods to Improve Work Posture," JIEMS J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55-69, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.30813/jiems.v14i1.2419. · DOI
  8. S. Wu, L. He, J. Li, J. Wang, and S. Wang, "Visual Display Terminal Use Increases the Prevalence and Risk of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Chinese Office , 03045 (2024) E3S Web of Conferences https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450003045 500 · DOI
  9. INTERCONNECTS 2023 Workers: A Cross-sectional Study," J. Occup. Health, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 34-43, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1539/joh.11-0119-OA. · DOI
  10. J. Żyga, "Musculoskeletal symptoms related to work environment -a report based on survey conducted among computer professionals," J. Educ. Health Sport, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 639-648, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.12775/JEHS.2022.12.07.064. · DOI
  11. G. Kibria, "Ergonomic Computer Workstation Design for University Teachers in Bangladesh," Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 91-103, 2019.
  12. M. Matos and P. M. Arezes, "Ergonomic Evaluation of Office Workplaces with Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA)," Procedia Manuf., vol. 3, pp. 4689-4694, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.562. · DOI
  13. A. Lotfollahzadeh et al., "Musculoskeletal Disorders among Healthcare Network Staff using Rapid Office Strain Assessment (2019)," Int. J. Musculoskelet. Pain Prev., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 270-276, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.52547/ijmpp.4.4.270. · DOI
  14. F. C. De Barros, C. S. Moriguchi, T. C. Chaves, D. M. Andrews, M. Sonne, and T. De Oliveira Sato, "Usefulness of the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) tool in detecting differences before and after an ergonomics intervention," BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., vol. 23, no. 1, p. 526, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05490-8. · DOI
  15. F. C. Filip and V. Marascu-Klein, "The 5S lean method as a tool of industrial management performances," IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 95, no. 012127, pp. 1-6, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012127. · DOI
  16. O. Omogbai and K. Salonitis, "The Implementation of 5S Lean Tool Using System Dynamics Approach," 18. Procedia CIRP, vol. 60, pp. 380-385, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.057. · DOI
  17. E. J. H. Lamprea, Z. M. C. Carreño, and P. M. T. M. Sánchez, "Impact of 5S on productivity, quality, organizational climate and industrial safety in Caucho Metal Ltda," Ingeniare Rev. Chil. Ing., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 107-117, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.4067/S0718- 33052015000100013. , 03045 (2024) E3S Web of Conferences https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450003045 500 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Septiani, W., Angelika, V., & Rahmawati, N.
Affiliations
Universitas Trisakti (ID)
Corresponding author
Septiani, Winnie
Venue
E3S Web of Conferences
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2024
Volume
500
Pages
03045
ISSN
2267-1242 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392666014
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • E3S Web of Conferences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
Keywords
musculoskeletal disorders, office ergonomics, workstation design, 5S, document organization, work posture, Nordic Body Map, workspace layout, back pain, neck pain, work organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review