Cited by 4Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsGNSS positioning and interferenceNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies

Comparison of VLBI and GNSS common view for time transfer

Open access
Wang, Pingli, Wang, Guangli, Gao, Yuping, Cai, Hongbing, Liu, Na·2019·International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering

Abstract

With the rapid development of optical clock, the stability and system uncertainty of optical clocks has reached a 1.0e–18 level. Optical clocks will likely constitute the next generation of time-frequency standards for redefining the SI second. Because time and frequency transfer services that rely on satellite systems are not always reliable and currently available technologies are insufficient for comparing the next generation of frequency standards, high-precision time and transfer techniques are strongly desired. Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) is one of the space geodetic techniques that measure the arrival time delays between multiple stations utilizing radio signals from distant celestial radio sources. Not only can VLBI obtain the angle position measurement of the radio source with sub-millisecond accuracy and the station coordinate measurement with millimeter accuracy, but also, it can provide high-precision information regarding inter-station atomic clock differences. Therefore, it is theoretically feasible to use the VLBI technology to do the remote time transfer. Because of this characteristic of VLBI technology, VLBI has significant application potential in the field of remote time transfer. To confirm the suitability of VLBI to time-frequency transfer for future practical applications, the results of VLBI and GPS common view time transfer were compared using a Kunming-Urumqi baseline. The performance characteristics of time transfer based on VLBI are then analyzed. Experimental results show that VLBI technology can accurately measure the variation of clock differences between stations as same as the GPS common view time comparison technology. It briefly describes the challenges of future VLBI technology for practical applications of time transfer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/ijmqe/2019014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, P., Wang, G., Gao, Y., Cai, H., & Liu, N.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Pingli
Venue
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2019
Volume
10
Pages
15
ISSN
  • 2107-6839 (ISSN-L)
  • 2107-6847
OpenAlex
W2989994007
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11373028)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Time Synchronization Technologies
Keywords
very long baseline interferometry, time transfer, optical clocks, time and frequency transfer, GPS time transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review