Estimation of radioecological sensitivity
Open accessAbstract
After the release of radionuclides into the environment it is important to be able to readily identify major routes of radiation exposure, the most highly exposed individuals or populations and the geographical areas of most concern. There have been significant recent improvements in our capability to estimate spatial variation in the environmental behaviour of radionuclides through better understanding of the underlying processes and an ability to spatially apply this knowledge by integrating relevant spatial information in the form of digital data sets using geographical information systems. Thus, it is now possible to refine the estimation of spatial variation in radiation exposure, both for routine releases and in accident situations. Within a recent EC-funded concerted action (the Radioecological Sensitivity Forum), there has been a renewed consideration of the concept of radioecological sensitivity with a particular focus on identifying sensitive areas as well as processes and communities. The concept should be relevant for both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and might even be applied for consideration of doses to biota, although the current focus has been restricted to a consideration of human exposure. The conclusions of the action are outlined, considering the potential usefulness of the concept, and methods by which it can be applied. A framework for the estimation of radioecological sensitivity is proposed and the various measures by which it can be considered, including (i) aggregated transfer coefficients, (ii) action loads, (iii) fluxes and (iv) individual exposure of humans are discussed. The importance of spatial and temporal consideration of each of these outputs is emphasized.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The approach allows ranking radioecological districts by radioecological sensitivity or criticality, meaning their capacity to form increased internal doses from consumption of contaminated products for equal deposition.
“Такий підхід дозволяє ранжувати окремі радіоекологічні райони за ступенем радіоекологічної чутливості або радіоекологічної критичності території [9,10], тобто здатності формувати на ній підвищені дози внутрішнього опромінення населення внаслідок споживання забруднених продуктів за однакової величини радіонуклідних випадань.”
From https://npe.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/28-6.pdf (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
https://npe.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/28-6.pdf
Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants, N. O. U., Talerko, M. M., Lev, T. D., Prister, B. S., Voitsekhovych, O. V., & Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute, S. E. S. O. U. (2023) · Nuclear Power and the Environment · doi:10.31717/2311-8253.23.3.7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Howard, B. J., Strand, P., Assimakopoulos, P., Bréchignac, F., Gasco, C., Métivier, H., Moberg, L., Smith, J. T., Tamponnet, C., Trueba, C., Voigt, G., & Wright, S. M.
- Affiliations
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
- Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (NO)
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
- Dorset Green Technology Park (GB)
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES)
- Helmholtz Munich (DE)
- Venue
- Radioprotection
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- C1
- Pages
- C1-1167-C1-1173
- ISSN
- 0033-8451 (ISSN-L)
- 1769-700X
- OpenAlex
- W2004377430
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Radioprotection (publishedVersion)
- Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Radioactive contamination and transfer
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Nuclear and radioactivity studies
- Keywords
- radionuclide release, radiation exposure, sensitive areas, transfer coefficient, flux, human exposure, terrestrial ecosystems, aquatic ecosystems, geographic information systems, nuclear accidents, spatial variability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review