Cited by 944Multi-Criteria Decision MakingGame Theory and Voting SystemsRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic

Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples

Open access
Roy, B.·1968·Revue française d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle

Abstract

La méthode ELECTRE) par B. ROY ( 2 ) Résumé.-• Après des considérations d'ordre général visant à cerner et à catégorier tes problèmes, nous mettrons Vaccent sur une méthode (laquelle a donné lieu à un programme baptisé ELECTRE) dont voici Vessentiel : Soit E un ensemble d'objets sur lesquels n points de vue permettent de définir n préordres complets.La méthode consiste à élaborer une relation résultante à partir de laquelle on puisse justifier Vélimination d'un sous-ensemble de E afin de restreindre le problème du choix aux sous-ensembles complémentaires, ou encore afin de faire apparaître un classement dichotomique d'un certain type.Deux indicateurs, l'un dit de « concordance », Vautre dit de «t discordance » permettent d'introduire cette relation résultante, et de fonder la partition sur la notion de noyau d'un graphe.Quelques exemples serviront à justifier cette démarche.Une esquisse de quelques généralisations permettant d'aborder des problèmes plus complexes sera présentée en fin d'article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/ro/196802v100571

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. K. J. ARROW, Social choice and individual values, Wiley.
  2. P. C-FISHBURN, A note on recent developments in additive utility théories for mul- tiple-factor situations, Opérations Research, vol. 14, n° 6, november-december 1966, Printed in U.S.A.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roy, B.
Corresponding author
Roy, B.
Venue
Revue française d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
1968
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
57-75
ISSN
0035-3035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W297774234
Cited by
944
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Revue française d informatique et de recherche opérationnelle (publishedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • French digital mathematics library (Numdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Keywords
ELECTRE method, multi-criteria decision making, ranking of alternatives, multiple criteria, concordance index, dichotomous classification, graph kernels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review