The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional evaluation : Barthel index
Mahonery, F. I. (1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,762
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1987) · Cited by 4,207
Progress in Development of the Index of ADL
Katz, S., Downs, T. D., Cash, H. R., & Grotz, R. C. (1970) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20 · Cited by 4,118
Katz, S. (1963) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016 · Cited by 2,421
The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability?
Wade, D. T., & Collin, C. (1988) · International Disability Studies · doi:10.3109/09638288809164105 · Cited by 1,582
A methodological framework for assessing health indices
Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0 · Cited by 1,538
The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review
Ottenbacher, K. J., Hsu, Y., Granger, C. V., & Fiedler, R. C. (1996) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90184-7 · Cited by 1,411
The structure and stability of the functional independence measure
Linacre, J. M., Heinemann, A. W., Wright, B. D., Granger, C. V., & Hamilton, B. B. (1994) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90384-0 · Cited by 1,274
A Measure of Primary Sociobiological Functions
Katz, S., & Akpom, C. A. (1976) · International Journal of Health Services · doi:10.2190/uurl-2ryu-wryd-ey3k · Cited by 1,225
Dodds, T. A., Martin, D. P., Stolov, W. C., & Deyo, R. A. (1993) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90119-u · Cited by 1,048
Cited by
Targeting Recovery: Priorities of the Spinal Cord-Injured Population
Anderson, K. D. (2004) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371 · Cited by 2,094
Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research
Andresen, E. M. (2000) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.20619 · Cited by 869
Reliability and validity of the CMT neuropathy score as a measure of disability
Padua, L., Aprile, I., Caliandro, P., Pazzaglia, C., Commodari, I., & Tonali, P. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000216104.34658.82 · Cited by 324
Forman, D. E., Arena, R., Boxer, R., Dolansky, M. A., Eng, J. J., Fleg, J. L., Haykowsky, M., Jahangir, A., Kaminsky, L. A., Kitzman, D. W., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000483 · Cited by 319
Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation
Salter, K., Jutai, J., Teasell, R., Foley, N., BItensky, J., & Bayley, M. (2005) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/0963828040008552 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, M. E., & Marino, R. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 12 Suppl 2
- Pages
- S21-S29
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980514130
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 43.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/apmr.2000.20620
- The paper
- Cohen, M. E., & Marino, R. J. (2000). The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.20620
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
