The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf01593882 · Cited by 2,206
Measuring Quality of Life in Asthma
Juniper, E. F., Guyatt, G. H., Ferrie, P. J., & Griffith, L. E. (1993) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/147.4.832 · Cited by 887
Cited by
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · Cited by 10,764
Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
Blum, L., & Korner-Bitensky, N. (2008) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20070205 · Cited by 1,207
Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest
Franchignoni, F., Horak, F., Godi, M., Nardone, A., & Giordano, A. (2010) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-0537 · Cited by 1,081
Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S. S., Heaton, R. K., Tulsky, D. S., Zelazo, P. D., Slotkin, J., Carlozzi, N. E., Bauer, P. J., Wallner-Allen, K., Fox, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617714000320 · Cited by 342
Retest reliability of surveillance questions on health related quality of life
Andresen, E. M., Catlin, T. K., Wyrwich, K. W., & Jackson-Thompson, J. (2003) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.57.5.339 · Cited by 335
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Andresen, E. M.
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 12 Suppl 2
- Pages
- S15-S20
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033535857
- Cited by
- 869
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/apmr.2000.20619
- The paper
- Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.20619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
