The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: A multicenter study
Abstract
Objective To evaluate an implanted neuroprosthesis that allows tetraplegic users to control grasp and release in 1 hand.Design Multicenter cohort trial with at least 3 years of follow-up. Function for each participant was compared before and after implantation, and with and without the neuroprosthesis activated.Setting Tertiary spinal cord injury (SCI) care centers, 8 in the United States, 1 in the United Kingdom, and 1 in Australia.Participants Fifty-one tetraplegic adults with C5 or C6 SCIs.Intervention An implanted neuroprosthetic system, in which electric stimulation of the grasping muscles of 1 arm are controlled by using contralateral shoulder movements, and concurrent tendon transfer surgery. Assessed participants' ability to grasp, move, and release standardized objects; degree of assistance required to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), device usage; and user satisfaction.Main outcome measures Pinch force; grasp and release tests; ADL abilities test and ADL assessment test; and user satisfaction survey.Results Pinch force was significantly greater with the neuroprosthesis in all available 50 participants, and grasp-release abilities were improved in 49. All tested participants (49/49) were more independent in performing ADLs with the neuroprosthesis than they were without it. Home use of the device for regular function and exercise was reported by over 90% of the participants, and satisfaction with the neuroprosthesis was high.Conclusions The grasping ability provided by the neuroprosthesis is substantial and lasting. The neuroprosthesis is safe, well accepted by users, and offers improved independence for a population without comparable alternatives.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been found suitable and reliable in both upper and lower extremity applications in various clinical studies [27, 28].”
From Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcomes from the Model Systems
Stover, S. L., DeLisa, J. A., & Whiteneck, G. G. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 401
Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcomes from the Model Systems
Parent, N. (1996) · JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics · doi:10.1097/00008526-199600810-00008 · Cited by 387
Smith, B., Peckham, P. H., Keith, M. W., & Roscoe, D. D. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1987.325979 · Cited by 281
Self-citationImplantable functional neuromuscular stimulation in the tetraplegic hand
Keith, M. W., Peckham, P. H., Thrope, G. B., Stroh, K. C., Smith, B., Buckett, J. R., Kilgore, K. L., & Jatich, J. W. (1989) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80017-6 · Cited by 212
Self-citationWuolle, K. S., Doren, C. L. V., Thrope, G. B., Keith, M. W., & Peckham, P. H. (1994) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/0363-5023(94)90008-6 · Cited by 198
Self-citationMcDowell, C. L., Moberg, E., & House, J. H. (1986) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80213-1 · Cited by 198
An Implanted Upper-Extremity Neuroprosthesis. Follow-up of Five Patients*
KILGORE, K. L., PECKHAM, P. H., KEITH, M. W., THROPE, G. B., WUOLLE, K. S., BRYDEN, A. M., & HART, R. L. (1997) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199704000-00008 · Cited by 192
Self-citationMoberg, E., McDowell, C. L., & House, J. H. (1989) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80064-4 · Cited by 178
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Betz, 1994, Bipolar latissimus dorsi transposition and functional nerve stimulation in adolescents with C5 tetraplegia, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, 939
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Targeting Recovery: Priorities of the Spinal Cord-Injured Population
Anderson, K. D. (2004) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371 · Cited by 2,094
“Of extreme relevance, however, are past, current, and future studies involving the use of FES to improve arm and hand function for quadriplegics (Peckham et al., 2002, 2001; Bryden et al., 2000; Grill and Peckham, 1998; Keith et al., 1989).”
Ajiboye, A. B., Willett, F. R., Young, D. R., Memberg, W. D., Murphy, B. A., Miller, J. P., Walter, B. L., Sweet, J. A., Hoyen, H. A., Keith, M. W., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30601-3 · Cited by 862
“Failed reaching attempts were categorized as due to: (1) muscle fatigue making it impossible to reach the target even at full stimulation, (2) control interface (FES and MAS) challenges making it difficult to accurately stop within the target region, or (3) failure to decode the correct command signal to move the join…”
Self-citationFunctional Electrical Stimulation for Neuromuscular Applications
Peckham, P. H., & Knutson, J. S. (2005) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140103 · Cited by 805
Self-citationPfurtscheller, G., Müller, G. R., Pfurtscheller, J., Gerner, H. J., & Rupp, R. (2003) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00947-9 · Cited by 548
Wireless Power Transfer Strategies for Implantable Bioelectronics
Agarwal, K., Jegadeesan, R., Guo, Y., & Thakor, N. V. (2017) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2017.2683520 · Cited by 549
“Cardiac [1], cochlear [2], spinal [3], retinal [4], motor [5], and cortical [6] implants have seen unprecedented growth in the last two decades to have functionality, form factor, and packaging suitable for chronic implantation.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Peckham, P. H., Keith, M. W., Kilgore, K. L., Grill, J. H., Wuolle, K. S., Thrope, G. B., Gorman, P., Hobby, J., Mulcahey, M. J., Carroll, S., Hentz, V. R., & Wiegner, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1380-1388
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044493647
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000080, 5M01RR 00080)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Keywords
- tetraplegia, spinal cord injury, hand grasp, grasp and release, tendon transfer, pinch strength, activities of daily living, user satisfaction, upper limb prosthesis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hand, Humans, Male, Prosthesis Design, Quadriplegia, Cohort Studies, Hand Strength, Prostheses and Implants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
