The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction
Open accessAbstract
AIMS A retrospective analysis of the psychological advantages of immediate reconstruction (IR) against delayed reconstruction (DR). METHODS A total of 121 patients who underwent different types of breast reconstruction were seen in the follow-up clinic and assessed for: anxiety, depression, body image, self-esteem, sexuality and satisfaction. RESULTS Ninety-five percent of the patients who had IR preferred this technique and 76% of the DR group would have preferred IR. Anxiety and depression were decreased and body image, self-esteem and sexual feeling of attractiveness and satisfaction were significantly superior in the IR group compared with that of the DR group. CONCLUSION Patients who had immediate reconstruction recalled less distress and had better psychosocial well being than those who had delayed reconstruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
The Psychological Impact of Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Women with Early Breast Cancer
Stevens, L. A., McGrath, M. H., Druss, R. G., Kister, S. J., Gump, F. E., & Forde, K. A. (1984) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-198404000-00018 · Cited by 299
A Comparison of Outcomes Using Three Different Methods of Breast Reconstruction
Kroll, S. S., & Baldwin, B. (1992) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199209000-00015 · Cited by 277
A Comparison of Resource Costs of Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction
Khoo, A., Kroll, S. S., Reece, G. P., et al. (1998) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199804040-00011 · Cited by 177
Weitzner, M. A., Meyers, C. A., Stuebing, K. K., & Saleeba, A. K. (1997) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s005200050067 · Cited by 150
The assessment of body image in cancer patients
Hopwood, P. (1993) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/0959-8049(93)90193-j · Cited by 115
Patients' psychological and cosmetic experience after immediatebreast reconstruction
Rosengvist, S., Sandelin, K., & Wickman, M. (1996) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/s0748-7983(96)80015-1 · Cited by 110
Patient Acceptance of Immediate Reconstruction Following Mastectomy
Noone, R. B., Frazier, T. G., Hayward, C. Z., & Skiles, M. S. (1982) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-198204000-00010 · Cited by 106
Survery of Patientʼs Responses to Breast Reconstruction
Teimourian, B., & Adham, M. N. (1982) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000637-198210000-00010 · Cited by 69
Psychological implications of mastectomy
Ray, C. (1977) · British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1977.tb00244.x · Cited by 50
Cited by
Al-Ghazal, S. K., Fallowfield, L., & Blamey, R. W. (2000) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00197-0 · Cited by 655
Self-citationCurrent Trends in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
Panchal, H., & Matros, E. (2017) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003941 · Cited by 462
Breast Reconstruction after Surgery for Breast Cancer
Cordeiro, P. G. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmct0802899 · Cited by 395
Sheehan, J., Sherman, K. A., Lam, T., & Boyages, J. (2007) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1067 · Cited by 240
Hatcher, M. B. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7278.76 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Ghazal, S., Sully, L., Fallowfield, L., & Blamey, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO)
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-19
- ISSN
- 0748-7983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085766326
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/ejso.1999.0733
- The paper
- Al-Ghazal, S., Sully, L., Fallowfield, L., & Blamey, R. (2000). The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO). https://doi.org/10.1053/ejso.1999.0733
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.