The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of education and support on self-care and resource utilization in patients with heart failure
Abstract
AIMS: To test the effect of education and support by a nurse on self-care and resource utilization in patients with heart failure. METHODS: A total of 179 patients (mean age 73, 58% male, NYHA III-IV) hospitalized with heart failure were evaluated prospectively. Patients were randomized to the study intervention or to 'care as usual'. The supportive educative intervention consisted of intensive, systematic and planned education by a study nurse about the consequences of heart failure in daily life, using a standard nursing care plan developed by the researchers for older patients with heart failure. Education and support took place during the hospital stay and at a home visit within a week of discharge. Data were collected on self-care abilities, self-care behaviour, readmissions, visits to the emergency heart centre and use of other health care resources. RESULTS: Education and support from a nurse in a hospital setting and at home significantly increases self-care behaviour in patients with heart failure. Patients from both the intervention and the control group increased their self-care behaviour within 1 month of discharge, but the increase in the intervention group was significantly more after 1 month. Although self-care behaviour in both groups decreased during the following 8 months, the increase from baseline remained statistically significant in the intervention group, but not in the control group. No significant effects on resource utilization were found. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive, systematic, tailored and planned education and support by a nurse results in an increase in patients' self-care behaviour. No significant effects were found on use of health care resources. Additional organisational changes, such as longer follow-up and the availability of a heart failure specialist would probably enhance the effects of education and support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interventions to Reduce 30-Day Rehospitalization: A Systematic Review
Hansen, L. O., Young, R. S., Hinami, K., Leung, A., & Williams, M. V. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00008 · Cited by 1,182
Feltner, C., Jones, C. D., Cené, C. W., Zheng, Z.-J., Sueta, C. A., Coker-Schwimmer, E. J. L., Arvanitis, M., Lohr, K. N., Middleton, J. C., & Jonas, D. E. (2014) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0083 · Cited by 681
Randomised Controlled Trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure
Austin, J., Williams, R., Ross, L., Moseley, L., & Hutchison, S. (2005) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.10.004 · Cited by 251
Le Berre, M., Maimon, G., Sourial, N., Guériton, M., & Vedel, I. (2017) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.14828 · Cited by 174
Ågren, S., Evangelista, L. S., Hjelm, C., & Strömberg, A. (2012) · Journal of Cardiac Failure · doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.01.014 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaarsma, T.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 673-682
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112632904
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of education and support on self-care and resource utilization in patients with heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/euhj.1998.1341
- The paper
- Jaarsma, T. (1999). Effects of education and support on self-care and resource utilization in patients with heart failure. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1998.1341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.