Cited by 174Hospital Admissions and OutcomesChronic Disease Management StrategiesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Impact of transitional care services for chronically ill older patients: a systematic evidence review

Le Berre, Mélanie, Maimon, Geva, Sourial, Nadia, Guériton, Muriel, Vedel, Isabelle·2017·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Transitions in care from hospital to primary care for older patients with chronic diseases (CD) are complex and lead to increased mortality and service use. In response to these challenges, transitional care (TC) interventions are being widely implemented. They encompass education on self-management, discharge planning, structured follow-up and coordination among the different healthcare professionals. We conducted a systematic review to determine the effectiveness of interventions targeting transitions from hospital to the primary care setting for chronically ill older patients.. Randomized controlled trials were identified through Medline, CINHAL, PsycInfo, EMBASE (1995-2015). Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, data extraction and assessment of study quality (Cochrane "Risk of Bias"). Risk differences (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) or mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model. From 10,234 references, 92 studies were included. Compared to usual care, significantly better outcomes were observed: a lower mortality at 3 (RD: -0.02 [-0.05, 0.00]; NNT: 50), 6, 12 and 18 months post-discharge, a lower rate of ED visits at 3 months (RD: -0.08 [-0.15, -0.01]; NNT: 13), a lower rate of readmissions at 3 (RD: -0.08 [-0.14, -0.03]; NNT: 7), 6, 12 and 18 months and a lower mean of readmission days at 3 (MD: -1.33; [-2.15, -0.52]), 6, 12 and 18 months. No significant differences were observed in quality of life. In conclusion, TC improves transitions for older patients and should be included in the reorganization of healthcare services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.14828

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le Berre, M., Maimon, G., Sourial, N., Guériton, M., & Vedel, I.
Affiliations
  • Lady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital Montreal Québec Canada
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Vedel, Isabelle
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-12
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
1597-1608
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2607455902
Cited by
174
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR KRS‐250478)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
care transitions, hospital-to-primary care transition, older adults, chronic disease, discharge planning, hospital readmission, emergency department visits, mortality, self-management education, quality of life, care coordination
MeSH terms
Transitional Care, Chronic Disease, Hospitalization, Humans, Patient Discharge, Patient Education as Topic, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Self Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review