The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for prognosis in chronic heart failure: continuous and independent prognostic value from VE/VCO2slope and peak VO2
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure carries a poor prognosis. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is useful in predicting survival. We set out to establish the prognostic value of peak VO(2)and VE/VCO(2)slope across a range of threshold values. METHOD AND RESULTS: Three hundred and three consecutive patients with stable chronic heart failure underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing between 1992 and 1996. Their age was 59+/-11 years (mean+/-SD), peak VO(2)17. 8+/- 6.6 ml. kg(-1)min(-1), VE/VCO(2)slope 37+/-12. At the end of follow-up in January 1999, 91 patients had died (after a median of 7 months, interquartile range 3-16 months). The median follow-up for the survivors was 47 months (interquartile range 37-57 months). The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for predicting mortality at 2 years were 0.77 for both peak VO(2)and VE/VCO(2)slope. With peak VO(2)and VE/VCO(2)slope viewed as continuous variables in the Cox proportional-hazards model, they were both highly significant prognostic indicators, both in univariate analysis and bivariate analysis (P<0.001 for VE/VCO(2)slope, P<0.003 for peak VO(2)). CONCLUSIONS: Lower peak VO(2)implies poorer prognosis across a range of values from 10 to 20 ml. kg(-1)min(-1), without a unique threshold. Gradations of elevation of the VE/VCO(2)slope also carry prognostic information over a wide range (30-55). The two parameters are comparable in terms of prognostic power, and contribute complementary prognostic information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Balady, G. J., Arena, R., Sietsema, K., Myers, J., Coke, L., Fletcher, G. F., Forman, D., Franklin, B., Guazzi, M., Gulati, M., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3181e52e69 · Cited by 1,964
Diller, G.-P., Dimopoulos, K., Okonko, D., Li, W., Babu-Narayan, S. V., Broberg, C. S., Johansson, B., Bouzas, B., Mullen, M. J., Poole-Wilson, P. A., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.529800 · Cited by 878
Self-citationArena, R., Myers, J., Williams, M. A., Gulati, M., Kligfield, P., Balady, G. J., Collins, E., & Fletcher, G. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.184461 · Cited by 727
Jones, D. G., Haldar, S. K., Hussain, W., Sharma, R., Francis, D. P., Rahman-Haley, S. L., McDonagh, T. A., Underwood, S. R., Markides, V., & Wong, T. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.069 · Cited by 481
Caminiti, G., Volterrani, M., Iellamo, F., Marazzi, G., Massaro, R., Miceli, M., Mammi, C., Piepoli, M., Fini, M., & Rosano, G. M. C. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.078 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Francis, D.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 154-161
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045033514
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for prognosis in chronic heart failure: continuous and independent prognostic value from VE/VCO2slope and peak VO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/euhj.1999.1863
- The paper
- Francis, D. (2000). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for prognosis in chronic heart failure: continuous and independent prognostic value from VE/VCO2slope and peak VO2. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1999.1863
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.