Cited by 81Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyChild and Adolescent Health

Overview on the Challenges and Benefits of Using Telehealth Tools in a Pediatric Population

Brophy, Patrick D.·2017·Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease

Abstract

Telehealth in Pediatric Medicine presents many of the same benefits and challenges noted in adult-based medicine. In terms of health care delivery, the promise of improving access and reducing costs using telehealth in Pediatrics, particularly chronic care, is high. The ability to address clinician shortages and provide remote guidance for chronic care pathways from pediatric subspecialists to rural-based referring physicians is a developing model that represents a sustainable and cost-effective strategy to improve pediatric care. The adoption and implementation of consistent telehealth programs require a readjustment of current regulatory rules and a national discussion on reimbursement and compliance standards. Presently, state laws generally define the rules, whereby health systems or practices can use telehealth for patient care and education. Long-term telehealth program development depends on the ongoing value and use case provided by pediatric advocates for this emerging health care delivery model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.12.003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The questionnaire included the System Usability Scale (SUS) and other measures using a 5-point Likert scale.

    “Our questionnaire includes the System Usability Scale (SUS) [22], the comparison against the basic method of leaving a message, the health support experience, and a few VA-specific experience questions, using a 5-point Likert scale.”
  • The questionnaire included the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) and the System Usability Scale (SUS).

    “Our questionnaire includes the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) [50], the System Usability Scale (SUS) [22], the comparison against the basic method of processing messages, the work support experience, and a few dashboard user experience questions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brophy, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Brophy, Patrick D.
Venue
Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
17-21
ISSN
1548-5595 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589953586
Cited by
81
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
telemedicine, chronic care, health care access, health care costs, clinician shortage, rural health care, telemedicine regulation, reimbursement
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Delivery of Health Care, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Pediatrics, Peritoneal Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation, Telemedicine, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review