Cited by 215Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeTechnology Use by Older Adults

Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years

Mistry, Hema·2012·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

A systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare was undertaken from 1990 until September 2010. Twelve databases were searched, using economic evaluation terms combined with telemedicine terms. The search identified 80 studies which were classed as full economic evaluations; the majority (38) were cost-consequence analyses. There were 15 cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) and seven cost-utility analyses (CUA). In the period January 2004 to September 2010 there were 47 studies. Eleven were CEA and seven were CUA. Economic tools are being increasingly used for telemedicine and telecare studies, although better reporting of the methodologies and findings of the economic evaluations is required. Nonetheless, the results of the review were consistent with previous findings, i.e. there is no further conclusive evidence that telemedicine and telecare interventions are cost-effective compared to conventional health care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jtt.2011.110505

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mistry, H.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Mistry, Hema
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2011-11-18
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2071077750
Cited by
215
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
telemedicine, telecare, cost-effectiveness, economic evaluation, cost-consequence analysis, cost-utility analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, reporting quality, health technology assessment
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Humans, Time Factors, Health Care Costs, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review