CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Canine Chronic Inflammatory Rhinitis

Windsor, Rebecca C., Johnson, Lynelle R.·2006·Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice
DOI 10.1053/j.ctsap.2005.12.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Chronic inflammatory rhinitis is commonly found in dogs with chronic nasal disease and is characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the nasal mucosa in the absence of an obvious etiologic process. The pathogenesis of lymphoplasmacytic rhinitis remains unknown. Animals respond poorly to antibiotics, oral glucocorticoids, and antihistamines, making primary infectious, immune-mediated, or allergic etiologies unlikely. Aberrant immune response to inhaled organisms or allergens may induce inflammation in some animals. Common clinical signs include nasal discharge, sneezing, coughing, epistaxis, and stertor. Diagnosis is made by performing a thorough history, physical examination, radiography or advanced imaging (via computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), rhinoscopy, and nasal mucosal biopsy to rule out primary etiologies of nasal discharge. Treatment strategies have included various antibiotics, antihistamines, oral and inhalant steroids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatories, and antifungal medications. Some dogs may respond partially to doxycycline or azithromycin, although it is unclear whether response is related to antimicrobial or antiinflammatory properties of these drugs. Hydration of the nasal cavity through nasal drops or aerosols may limit nasal discharge, and some animals may improve with inhalant (but rarely oral) glucocorticoids.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.ctsap.2005.12.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Henn, 2005, Seroprevalence of antibodies against Bartonella species and evaluation of risk factors and clinical signs associated with seropositivity in dogs, Am J Vet Res, 66, 688, 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.688 · DOI
  2. Pappalardo, 2000, Granulomatous disease associated with Bartonella infection in 2 dogs, J Vet Intern Med, 14, 37, 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2000.tb01497.x · DOI
  3. Breitschwerdt, 2005, Bartonella species as a potential cause of epistaxis in dogs, J Clin Microbiol, 43, 2529, 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2529-2533.2005 · DOI
  4. Windsor RC, Johnson LR, Sykes JE, et al: Molecular detection of microbes in nasal biopsies of dogs with idiopathic lymphoplasmacytic rhinitis. J Vet Int Med (in press)
  5. Windsor, 2004, Idiopathic lymphoplasmacytic rhinitis in 37 dogs, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 224, 1952, 10.2460/javma.2004.224.1952 · DOI
  6. Norris, 1985, Diseases of the nose and sinuses, Vet Clin North Am (Small Anim Pract), 15, 865, 10.1016/S0195-5616(85)50100-X · DOI
  7. Shin, 2004, Chronic rhinosinusitis, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 114, 1369, 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.012 · DOI
  8. Gosepath, 2004, Fungal DNA is present in tissue specimens of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, Am J Rhinol, 18, 9, 10.1177/194589240401800104 · DOI
  9. Gosepath, 2005, Role of fungus in eosinophilic sinusitis, Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 13, 9, 10.1097/00020840-200502000-00004 · DOI
  10. Hamilos, 2004, Etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 193, 27, 10.1177/00034894041130S508 · DOI
  11. Pant, 2005, Fungal-specific humoral response in eosinophilic mucus chronic rhinosinusitis, Laryngoscope, 115, 601, 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161341.00258.54 · DOI
  12. Sasama, 2005, New paradigm for the roles of fungi and eosinophils in chronic rhinosinusitis, Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 13, 2, 10.1097/00020840-200502000-00003 · DOI
  13. Polzehl, 2005, Fungus culture and PCR in nasal lavage samples of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, J Med Microbiol, 54, 31, 10.1099/jmm.0.45881-0 · DOI
  14. Schueller, 2004, Quantitative analysis of fungal DNA in chronic rhinosinusitis, Laryngoscope, 114, 467, 10.1097/00005537-200403000-00015 · DOI
  15. Rudolph, 2003, A model of allergic nasal congestion in dogs sensitized to ragweed, Am J Rhinol, 17, 227, 10.1177/194589240301700409 · DOI
  16. Cardell, 2000, Nasal secretion in ragweed-sensitized dogs, Acta Otolaryngol, 120, 757, 10.1080/000164800750000306 · DOI
  17. Tiniakov, 2003, Canine model of nasal congestion and allergic rhinitis, J Appl Physiol, 94, 1921, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00930.2002 · DOI
  18. Kurata, 2004, Immunological findings in 3 dogs clinically diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, J Vet Med Sci, 66, 25, 10.1292/jvms.66.25 · DOI
  19. Burgener, 1987, Lymphoplasmacytic rhinitis in five dogs, J Am Hosp Assoc, 23, 565
  20. Johnson, 2005, Cytokine gene transcription in feline nasal tissue with histologic evidence of inflammation, Am J Vet Res, 66, 996, 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.996 · DOI
  21. Russo, 2000, Distinguishing rhinitis and nasal neoplasia by radiography, Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 41, 118, 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01464.x · DOI
  22. Lefebvre, 2005, Computed tomography as an aid in the diagnosis of chronic nasal disease in dogs, J Small Anim Pract, 46, 280, 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2005.tb00321.x · DOI
  23. Saunders, 2003, Diagnostic value of computed tomography in dogs with chronic nasal disease, Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 44, 409, 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2003.tb00477.x · DOI
  24. Codner, 1993, Comparison of CT with radiography as a noninvasive diagnostic technique for chronic nasal disease in dogs, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 202, 1106, 10.2460/javma.1993.202.07.1106 · DOI
  25. Abramson, 1980, Microbiology of the canine nasal cavities, Rhinology, 18, 143
  26. Cohen, 2003, Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of cytologic examination, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 222, 964, 10.2460/javma.2003.222.964 · DOI
  27. Lin, 2001, Cytologic distinctions between clinical groups using curette-probe compared to cytology brush, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 86, 226, 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62696-8 · DOI
  28. Michiels, 2003, A retrospective study of non-specific rhinitis in 22 cats and the value of nasal cytology and histopathology, J Fel Med Surg, 5, 279, 10.1016/S1098-612X(03)00044-5 · DOI
  29. Parikh, 2001, Topical corticosteroids in chronic rhinosinusitis, Rhinology, 39, 75
  30. Dolor, 2001, Comparison of cefuroxime with or without intranasal fluticasone for the treatment of rhinosinusitis. The CAFFS Trial: a randomized controlled trial, J Am Med Assoc, 286, 3097, 10.1001/jama.286.24.3097 · DOI
  31. Dijkstra, 2004, Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray does not influence the recurrence rate of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 1 year after functional endoscopic sinus surgery, Clin Exp Allergy, 34, 1395, 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02044.x · DOI
  32. Weschta, 2004, Topical antifungal treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 113, 1122, 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.03.038 · DOI
  33. Ponikau, 2003, Intranasal antifungal treatment in 51 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 111, 1137

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Windsor, R. C., & Johnson, L. R.
Venue
Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
76-81
ISSN
1096-2867
DOI
10.1053/j.ctsap.2005.12.014
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review