Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cellular Changes in Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis

Open access
Grover, Madhusudan, Farrugia, Gianrico, Lurken, Matthew S., Bernard, Cheryl E., Faussone–Pellegrini, Maria Simonetta, Smyrk, Thomas C., Parkman, Henry P., Abell, Thomas L., Snape, William J., Hasler, William L., Ünalp–Arida, Aynur, Nguyen, Linda, Koch, Kenneth L., Calles, Jorges, Lee, Linda, Tonascia, James, Hamilton, Frank A., Pasricha, Pankaj J.·2011·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background Cellular changes associated with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis are not well described. Aim Describe histologic abnormalities in gastroparesis and compare findings in idiopathic versus diabetic gastroparesis. Methods Full thickness gastric body biopsies were obtained from 40 gastroparetics (20 diabetic) and matched controls. Sections were stained for H&E and trichrome, and immunolabeled with antibodies against PGP 9.5, nNOS, VIP, substance P and tyrosine hydroxylase to quantify nerves, S100β for glia, Kit for interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), CD45 and CD68, for immune cells and smoothelin for smooth muscle cells. Tissue was also examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results Histological abnormalities were found in 83% of patients. Most common defects were loss of ICC with remaining ICC showing injury, an abnormal immune infiltrate containing macrophages, and decreased nerve fibers. On light microscopy, no significant differences were found between diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis with the exception of nNOS expression which was decreased in more idiopathic gastroparetics (40%) compared to diabetic (20%) patients by visual grading. On electron microscopy, a markedly increased connective tissue stroma was present in both disorders. Conclusion This study suggests that on full thickness biopsies, cellular abnormalities are found in the majority of patients with gastroparesis. Most common findings were loss of Kit expression suggesting loss of ICC and an increase in CD45 and CD68 immunoreactivity. These findings suggest that examination of tissue can lead to valuable insights into the pathophysiology of these disorders and offers hope that new therapeutic targets can be found.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.046

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Grover, M., Farrugia, G., Lurken, M. S., Bernard, C. E., Faussone–Pellegrini, M. S., Smyrk, T. C., Parkman, H. P., Abell, T. L., Snape, W. J., Hasler, W. L., Ünalp–Arida, A., Nguyen, L., Koch, K. L., Calles, J., Lee, L., Tonascia, J., Hamilton, F. A., & Pasricha, P. J.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
140
Issue
5
Pages
1575-1585.e8
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003893456
Cited by
455
References
6
FWCI
25.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular Changes in Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.046
The paper
Grover, M., Farrugia, G., Lurken, M. S., Bernard, C. E., Faussone–Pellegrini, M. S., Smyrk, T. C., Parkman, H. P., Abell, T. L., Snape, W. J., Hasler, W. L., Ünalp–Arida, A., Nguyen, L., Koch, K. L., Calles, J., Lee, L., Tonascia, J., Hamilton, F. A., & Pasricha, P. J. (2011). Cellular Changes in Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.