Cited by 339Liver Disease and TransplantationGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentAbdominal vascular conditions and treatments

Addition of simvastatin to standard therapy for the prevention of variceal rebleeding does not reduce rebleeding but increases survival in patients with cirrhosis

Abraldes, Juan G., Villanueva, Candid, Aracil, Carles, Turnes, Juan, Hernandez-Guerra, Manuel, Genesca, Joan, Rodriguez, Manuel, Castellote, Jose +39 more·2016·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims The combination of β-blockers and band ligation is the standard approach to prevent variceal rebleeding, but bleeding recurs and mortality is high. The lipid-lowering drug simvastatin decreases portal pressure, improves hepatocellular function, and might reduce liver fibrosis. We assessed whether adding simvastatin to standard therapy could reduce rebleeding and death after variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.Methods We performed a multicenter, double-blind, parallel trial of 158 patients with cirrhosis receiving standard prophylaxis to prevent rebleeding (a β-blocker and band ligation) in Spain from October 2010 through October 2013. Within 10 days of bleeding, subjects were randomly assigned, but stratified by Child-Pugh class of A or B vs C, to groups given simvastatin (20 mg/d the first 15 days, 40 mg/d thereafter; n = 69) or placebo (n = 78). Patients were followed for as long as 24 months. The primary end point was a composite of rebleeding and death, and main secondary end points were the individual components of the composite (death and rebleeding).Results The primary end point was met by 30 of 78 patients in the placebo group and 22 of 69 in the simvastatin group (P = .423). Seventeen patients in the placebo group died (22%) vs 6 patients in the simvastatin group (9%) (hazard ratio for adding simvastatin to therapy = 0.39; 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.99; P = .030). Simvastatin did not increase survival of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis. Rebleeding occurred in 28% of patients in the placebo group and 25% in the simvastatin group (P = .583). Serious adverse events occurred in 53% of patients in the placebo group and 49% in the simvastatin group (P = .752); the percentages of serious adverse events related to therapy were 11% in the placebo group vs 8% in the in the simvastatin group (P = .599). Two patients in the simvastatin group, each with advanced liver disease, developed rhabdomyolysis.Conclusions In a randomized controlled trial, addition of simvastatin to standard therapy did not reduce rebleeding, but was associated with a survival benefit for patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis. Survival was not the primary end point of the study, so these results require validation. The incidence of rhabdomyolysis in patients receiving 40 mg/d simvastatin was higher than expected. European Clinical Trial Database ID: EUDRACT 2009-016500-24; ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01095185.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.004

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients under secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, the addition of statin therapy to standard of care has shown a survival benefit in patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis.

    “Most importantly in patients under secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, the addition of statin therapy to standard of care has shown a survival benefit in patients with Child‐Pugh class A or B cirrhosis; [93] however, only five patients with NAFLD have been included in this study.”

    From Current treatment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

  • In the statin trial, no statistical difference was seen between the simvastatin and placebo arm, however, rhabdomyolysis occurred in two (2.8%) patients.

    “In regard to adverse events, no statistical difference was seen between the simvastatin and placebo arm, however, rhabdomyolysis occurred in two (2.8%) patients [93].”

    From Current treatment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

  • Only five patients with NAFLD have been included in the statin survival study.

    “Most importantly in patients under secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, the addition of statin therapy to standard of care has shown a survival benefit in patients with Child‐Pugh class A or B cirrhosis; [93] however, only five patients with NAFLD have been included in this study.”

    From Current treatment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

  • One RCT testing simvastatin in individuals with variceal haemorrhage failed to show an impact on rebleeding.

    “One RCT testing simvastatin in individuals with variceal haemorrhage failed to show an impact on rebleeding and suggested an improvement in overall survival, and the drug was safe in this high-risk population. 471”
  • Simvastatin was safe in individuals with variceal haemorrhage.

    “One RCT testing simvastatin in individuals with variceal haemorrhage failed to show an impact on rebleeding and suggested an improvement in overall survival, and the drug was safe in this high-risk population. 471”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abraldes, J. G., Villanueva, C., Aracil, C., Turnes, J., Hernandez-Guerra, M., Genesca, J., Rodriguez, M., Castellote, J., García-Pagán, J. C., Torres, F., Calleja, J. L., Albillos, A., Bosch, J., Augustin, S., Llop, E., Arraez, D. M., Hernández Mesa, G., Martinez, J., Reverter, E., Seijo, S., Turon, F., Miñana, J., Buenestado, J., Reñe, J. M., Navacués, C. A., Planas, R., Morillas, R. M., Bellot, P., Such, J., Vergara, M., Puente, A., de la Pena, J., Mera Calviño, J., Rivas Moral, L., Pavel, O., Alvarado, E., Ardevol, A., Girbau, A., Cachero, A., Arnaiz, J. A., Berzigotti, A., Pich, J., Rios, J., Saenz, R., Millan, L., Beleta, H., & Ramos, N.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova (ES)
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Bosch, Jaime
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
150
Issue
5
Pages
1160-1170.e3
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2234170759
Cited by
339
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 23 · 2014: 1
FWCI
30.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01AA021908)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Keywords
simvastatin, variceal rebleeding, liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, variceal bleeding, survival, beta-blockers, band ligation, Child-Pugh score, serious adverse events, lipid-lowering drugs, portal pressure, liver fibrosis, hepatocellular function, drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Esophageal and Gastric Varices, Female, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Ligation, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Rhabdomyolysis, Risk Factors, Spain, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review