The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Is Superior to Fidaxomicin for Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is recommended for treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI). We performed a single-center randomized trial to compare the effects of FMT with those of fidaxomicin and vancomycin. METHODS: We studied consecutive adults with rCDI seen at a gastroenterology clinic in Denmark from April 5, 2016 through June 10, 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to a group that received FMT, applied by colonoscopy or nasojejunal tube, after 4-10 days of vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily; FMTv; n = 24), 10 days of fidaxomicin (200 mg twice daily; n = 24), or 10 days of vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily; n = 16). Patients who had rCDI after this course of treatment and patients who could not be randomly assigned to groups were offered rescue FMTv. The primary outcome was combined clinical resolution and a negative result from a polymerase chain reaction test for Clostridium difficile (CD) toxin 8 weeks after the allocated treatment. Secondary end points included clinical resolution at week 8. RESULTS: All 64 patients received their assigned treatment. The combination of clinical resolution and negative results from the test for CD were observed in 17 patients given FMTv (71%), 8 patients given fidaxomicin (33%), and 3 patients given vancomycin (19%; P = .009 for FMTv vs fidaxomicin; P = .001 for FMTv vs vancomycin; P = .31 for fidaxomicin vs vancomycin). Clinical resolution was observed in 22 patients given FMTv (92%), 10 patients given fidaxomicin (42%), and 3 patients given vancomycin (19%; P = .0002; P < .0001; P = .13). Results did not differ significantly between patients who received FMTv as their initial therapy and patients who received rescue FMTv. There was 1 serious adverse event that might have been related to FMTv. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of patients with rCDI, we found the FMTv combination superior to fidaxomicin or vancomycin based on end points of clinical and microbiological resolution or clinical resolution alone. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02743234; EudraCT, j.no 2015-003004-24.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“has proven to be a reliable therapeutic alternative to the antibiotics vancomycin 6,7 and fidaxomicin. 8”
From Key determinants of success in fecal microbiota transplantation: From microbiome to clinic (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL
Clopper, C. J., & Pearson, E. S. (1934) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/26.4.404 · Cited by 5,327
Duodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile
van Nood, E., Vrieze, A., Nieuwdorp, M., Fuentes, S., Zoetendal, E. G., de Vos, W. M., Visser, C. E., Kuijper, E. J., Bartelsman, J. F. W. M., Tijssen, J. G. P., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1205037 · Cited by 3,708
Fundamentals of Clinical Trials
Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18539-2 · Cited by 2,237
Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin for Clostridium difficile Infection
Louie, T., Miller, M. A., Mullane, K. M., Weiss, K., Lentnek, A. L., Golan, Y., Gorbach, S. L., Sears, P. S., & Shue, Y. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0910812 · Cited by 1,610
Clostridium difficile Infection
Leffler, D. A., & LaMont, J. T. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1403772 · Cited by 1,501
Debast, S. B., Bauer, M. P., & Kuijper, E. J. (2013) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12418 · Cited by 1,241
European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice
Cammarota, G., Ianiro, G., Tilg, H., Rajilić-Stojanović, M., Kump, P., Satokari, R., Sokol, H., Arkkila, P., Pintus, C., Hart, A., et al. (2017) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017 · Cited by 1,207
Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey
Bauer, M. P., Notermans, D. W., BENTHEM, B. H. B. V., Brazier, J. S., Wilcox, M. H., Rupnik, M., Monnet, D. L., van Dissel, J. T., & Kuijper, E. J. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61266-4 · Cited by 1,049
Kyne, L., Warny, M., Qamar, A., & Kelly, C. P. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03592-3 · Cited by 798
Documenta Geigy; scientific tables.
(1963) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1963.03700140139041 · Cited by 778
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2011, Detailed guidance on the collection, verification and presentation of adverse event/reaction reports arising from clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (‘CT-3’). CELEX number 52011XC0611(01), Official Journal of the European Union
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Prehn, J., Reigadas, E., Vogelzang, E. H., Bouza, E., Hristea, A., Guery, B., Krutova, M., Norén, T., Allerberger, F., Coia, J. E., et al. (2021) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038 · Cited by 640
Cammarota, G., Ianiro, G., Kelly, C. R., Mullish, B. H., Allegretti, J. R., Kassam, Z., Putignani, L., Fischer, M., Keller, J. J., Costello, S. P., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548 · Cited by 506
Fecal microbiota transplantation: current challenges and future landscapes
Yadegar, A., Bar‐Yoseph, H., Monaghan, T. M., Pakpour, S., Severino, A., Kuijper, E. J., Smits, W. K., Terveer, E. M., Neupane, S., Nabavi-Rad, A., et al. (2024) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00060-22 · Cited by 397
Key determinants of success in fecal microbiota transplantation: From microbiome to clinic
Porcari, S., Benech, N., Valles-Colomer, M., Segata, N., Gasbarrini, A., Cammarota, G., Sokol, H., & Ianiro, G. (2023) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2023.03.020 · Cited by 331
The evolution of the use of faecal microbiota transplantation and emerging therapeutic indications.
Allegretti, J. R., Mullish, B. H., Kelly, C., & Fischer, M. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31266-8 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Hvas, C. L., Dahl Jørgensen, S. M., Jørgensen, S. P., Storgaard, M., Lemming, L., Hansen, M. M., Erikstrup, C., & Dahlerup, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Hvas, Christian Lodberg
- ORCID
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1324-1332.e3
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2907954911
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 33
- FWCI
- 36.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Aalborg Universitet
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Keywords
- fecal microbiota transplantation, recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, fidaxomicin, vancomycin, clinical resolution, treatment comparison, adverse events, Clostridium difficile infection
- MeSH terms
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Fidaxomicin, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Clostridium Infections, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Time Factors, Vancomycin, Clostridioides difficile, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
