Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 784

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses

Piovani, Daniele, Danese, Silvio, Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent, Nikolopoulos, Georgios K., Lytras, Theodore, Bonovas, Stefanos·2019·Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS Multiple environmental factors have been associated with development of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses to summarize available epidemiologic evidence and assess its credibility. METHODS We systematically identified and appraised meta-analyses of observational studies examining environmental factors and risk of IBD (Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC]). For each meta-analysis we considered the random-effects estimate, its 95% CI, the estimates of heterogeneity and small-study effects, and graded the evidence according to prespecified criteria. Methodologic quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2. RESULTS We examined 183 estimates in 53 meta-analyses of 71 environmental factors related to lifestyles and hygiene, surgeries, drug exposures, diet, microorganisms, and vaccinations. We identified 9 factors that increase risk of IBD: smoking (CD), urban living (CD and IBD), appendectomy (CD), tonsillectomy (CD), antibiotic exposure (IBD), oral contraceptive use (IBD), consumption of soft drinks (UC), vitamin D deficiency (IBD), and non-Helicobacter pylori-like enterohepatic Helicobacter species (IBD). We identified 7 factors that reduce risk of IBD: physical activity (CD), breastfeeding (IBD), bed sharing (CD), tea consumption (UC), high levels of folate (IBD), high levels of vitamin D (CD), Helicobacter pylori infection (CD, UC, and IBD). Epidemiologic evidence for all these associations were of high to moderate strength; we identified another 11 factors associated with increased risk and 16 factors associated with reduced risk with weak credibility. Methodologic quality varied considerably among meta-analyses. Several associations were based on findings from retrospective studies, so it is not possible to determine if these are effects of IBD or results of recall bias. CONCLUSIONS In an umbrella review of meta-analyses, we found varying levels of evidence for associations of different environmental factors with risk of IBD. High-quality prospective studies with analyses of samples from patients with recent diagnoses of IBD are needed to determine whether these factors cause or are results of IBD, and their pathogenic mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.016

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 784

Metadata

Authors
Piovani, D., Danese, S., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Nikolopoulos, G. K., Lytras, T., & Bonovas, S.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
157
Issue
3
Pages
647-659.e4
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2937883751
Cited by
784
References
18
FWCI
40.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.016
The paper
Piovani, D., Danese, S., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Nikolopoulos, G. K., Lytras, T., & Bonovas, S. (2019). Environmental Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.