Probiotics Reduce Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm, Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Open accessAbstract
Background & aims We aimed to compare the effectiveness of single- vs multiple-strain probiotics in a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, BIOSIS Previews, and Google Scholar through January 1, 2019, for studies of single-strain and multistrain probiotic formulations on the outcomes of preterm, low-birth-weight neonates. We used a frequentist approach for network meta-analysis and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, severe necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (Bell stage II or more), and culture-proven sepsis. Results We analyzed data from 63 trials involving 15,712 preterm infants. Compared with placebo, a combination of 1 or more Lactobacillus species (spp) and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp was the only intervention with moderate- or high-quality evidence of reduced all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.80). Among interventions with moderate- or high-quality evidence for efficacy compared with placebo, combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp, Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis, Lactobacillus reuteri, or Lactobacillus rhamnosus significantly reduced severe NEC (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20-0.59]; OR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.74]; OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.91]; and OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.21-0.90], respectively). There was moderate- or high-quality evidence that combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp and Saccharomyces boulardii reduced the number of days to reach full feeding (mean reduction of 3.30 days [95% CI, reduction of 5.91-0.69 days]). There was moderate- or high-quality evidence that, compared with placebo, the single-species product B animalis subsp lactis or L reuteri significantly reduced duration of hospitalization (mean reduction of 13.00 days [95% CI, reduction of 22.71-3.29 days] and mean reduction of 7.89 days [95% CI, reduction of 11.60-4.17 days], respectively). Conclusions In a systematic review and network meta-analysis of studies to determine the effects of single-strain and multistrain probiotic formulations on outcomes of preterm, low-birth-weight neonates, we found moderate to high evidence for the superiority of combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp vs single- and other multiple-strain probiotic treatments. The combinations of Bacillus spp and Enterococcus spp, and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp and Streptococcus salivarius subsp thermophilus, might produce the largest reduction in NEC development. Further trials are needed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Culture-proven invasive infection is studied as a primary or secondary outcome in most trials that administer probiotics to preterm neonates, and network meta-analyses suggest that probiotic administration does not increase rates of sepsis in this vulnerable population.
“Nonetheless, culture-proven invasive infection is studied as a primary or secondary outcome in most trials that administer probiotics to preterm neonates, and network meta-analyses suggest that probiotic administration does not increase rates of sepsis in this vulnerable population.59”
From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 100 · Cited by 246
- Authors
- Morgan, R. L., Preidis, G. A., Kashyap, P. C., Weizman, A. V., Sadeghirad, B., Chang, Y., Florez, I. D., Foroutan, F., Shahid, S., & Zeraatkar, D.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sadeghirad, Behnam
- ORCID
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 467-480
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8014956
- OpenAlex
- W3037711410
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Mitacs
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
- Keywords
- probiotics, preterm infants, low birth weight, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal sepsis, all-cause mortality, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, full feeding, neonatal gut microbiota
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Neonatal Sepsis, Network Meta-Analysis, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review