The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Reduces Symptoms in Some Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Predominant Abdominal Bloating: Short- and Long-term Results From a Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background & aims Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder associated with intestinal dysbiosis. Given the reported promising results of open-label fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) therapy in patients with predominant abdominal bloating, we studied efficacy of this treatment in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Methods Patients with refractory IBS, defined as failure of ≥3 conventional therapies, were randomly assigned to single-dose nasojejunal administration of donor stools (n = 43) or autologous stools (n = 19) in a double-blind study, performed from December 2015 through October 2017, and were followed up for 1 year. IBS-related symptoms were assessed by using a daily symptom diary to determine general abdominal discomfort, abdominal bloating, abdominal pain, and flatulence on a scale of 1-6. Number of daily bowel movements, consistency of the stools, and abdominal circumference were also recorded. Patients completed the IBS-specific quality of life questionnaire. Primary endpoints were improvement of IBS symptoms and bloating at 12 weeks (response). Secondary endpoints were changes in IBS symptom scores and quality of life. Stool samples were collected for microbiota amplicon sequencing. Open-label retransplantation was offered after the trial.Results At week 12, 56% of patients given donor stool reported improvement in both primary endpoints compared with 26% of patients given placebo (P = .03). Patients given donor stool had significant improvements in level of discomfort (mean reduction, 19%; median score before FMT, 3.98; range, 2.13-6.00; median score after FMT, 3.1; range, 951.29-5.90), stool frequency (mean reduction, 13%; median score before FMT, 2.10; range, 0.57-14.29; median score after FMT 1.7; range, 0.71-4.29), urgency (mean reduction, 38%; median score before FMT, 0.61; range, 0.00-1.00; median score after FMT, 0.37; range, 0.00-1.00), abdominal pain (mean reduction, 26%; median score before FMT, 3.88; range, 1.57-5.17; median score after FMT, 2.80; range, 1.14-4.94), flatulence (mean reduction, 10%; median score before FMT, 3.42; range, 0.71-6.00; median score after FMT, 3.07; range, 0.79-4.23), and quality of life (mean increase, 16%; median score before FMT 32.6; range, 11-119; median score after FMT, 43.1; range, 32.25-99). A significantly higher proportion of women given donor stool (69%) had a response than men (29%) (P = .01). Fecal samples from responders had higher diversity of microbiomes before administration of donor material than fecal samples from nonresponders (P = .04) and distinct baseline composition (P = .04), but no specific marker taxa were associated with response. After single FMT, 21% of patients given donor stool reported effects that lasted for longer than 1 year compared with 5% of patients given placebo stool. A second FMT reduced symptoms in 67% of patients with an initial response to donor stool but not in patients with a prior nonresponse.Conclusions In a randomized trial of patients with treatment-refractory IBS with predominant bloating, FMT relieved symptoms compared with placebo (autologous transplant), although the effects decreased over 1 year. A second FMT restored the response patients with a prior response. Response was associated with composition of the fecal microbiomes before FMT; this might be used to as a biomarker to select patients for this treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02299973.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, the extent of FMT engraftment in recipient mice may be influenced by the gender of the recipients.”
From Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [732]
In the citing paper
“Similar sexual dimorphism of FMT has been reported in a clinical trial of irritable bowel syndrome, wherein female patients exhibit significantly better responses compared to male patients.732”
From Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [732]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DADA2: High–resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., & Holmes, S. P. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3869 · Cited by 35,698
Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms
Caporaso, J. G., Lauber, C. L., Walters, W. A., Berg-Lyons, D., Huntley, J., Fierer, N., Owens, S. M., Betley, J., Fraser, L., Bauer, M., et al. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.8 · Cited by 8,839
Longstreth, G. F., Thompson, W. G., Chey, W. D., Houghton, L. A., Mearin, F., & Spiller, R. C. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061 · Cited by 4,856
Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers
Le Chatelier, E., Nielsen, T., Qin, J., Prifti, E., Hildebrand, F., Falony, G., Almeida, M., Arumugam, M., Batto, J.-M., Kennedy, S., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12506 · Cited by 4,662
Self-citationDuodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile
van Nood, E., Vrieze, A., Nieuwdorp, M., Fuentes, S., Zoetendal, E. G., de Vos, W. M., Visser, C. E., Kuijper, E. J., Bartelsman, J. F. W. M., Tijssen, J. G. P., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1205037 · Cited by 3,708
Microbiome Datasets Are Compositional: And This Is Not Optional
Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Egozcue, J. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224 · Cited by 3,044
Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation
Falony, G., Joossens, M., Vieira-Silva, S., Wang, J., Darzi, Y., Faust, K., Kurilshikov, A., Bonder, M. J., Valles-Colomer, M., Vandeputte, D., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad3503 · Cited by 2,400
Self-citationA Diet Low in FODMAPs Reduces Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Halmos, E. P., Power, V. A., Shepherd, S. J., Gibson, P. R., & Muir, J. G. (2014) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.09.046 · Cited by 1,249
Rifaximin Therapy for Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome without Constipation
Pimentel, M., Lembo, A., Chey, W. D., Zakko, S., Ringel, Y., Yu, J., Mareya, S. M., Shaw, A. L., Bortey, E., & Forbes, W. P. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1004409 · Cited by 1,036
Vandeputte, D., Falony, G., Vieira-Silva, S., Tito, R. Y., Joossens, M., & Raes, J. (2016) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309618 · Cited by 1,028
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–201 of 201
Hasanuzzaman, M., Bang, C. S., Lee, J. J., & Gong, E. J. (2026) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e335
“5 64-74 Some studies have reported symptom improvement, particularly in diarrhea-predominant IBS, 64,68,70,73 whereas others have shown limited benefits.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Holvoet, T., Joossens, M., Vázquez-Castellanos, J. F., Christiaens, E., Heyerick, L., Boelens, J., Verhasselt, B., van Vlierberghe, H., De Vos, M., Raes, J., & De Looze, D.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University Hospital (BE)
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Holvoet, Tom
- ORCID
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-157.e8
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3043347255
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 21
- FWCI
- 24.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Keywords
- fecal microbiota transplantation, irritable bowel syndrome, bloating, gut dysbiosis, symptom improvement, stool consistency, abdominal circumference, retransplantation, long-term outcomes, abdominal pain, flatulence
- MeSH terms
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Flatulence, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Abdominal Pain, Treatment Outcome, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review