Clinical care pathway for the risk stratification and management of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Open accessAbstract
Find AGA's NASH Clinical Care Pathway App for iOS and Android mobile devices at nash.gastro.org. Scan this QR code to be taken directly to the website.Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming increasingly common, currently affecting approximately 37% of US adults. NAFLD is most often managed in primary care or endocrine clinics, where clinicians must determine which patients might benefit from secondary care to address hepatic manifestations, comorbid metabolic traits, and cardiovascular risks of the disease. Because NAFLD is largely asymptomatic, and because optimal timing of treatment depends on accurate staging of fibrosis risk, screening at the primary care level is critical, together with consistent, timely, evidence-based, widely accessible, and testable management processes. To achieve these goals, the American Gastroenterological Association assembled a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a Clinical Care Pathway providing explicit guidance on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of NAFLD. This article describes the NAFLD Clinical Care Pathway they developed and provides a rationale supporting proposed steps to assist clinicians in diagnosing and managing NAFLD with clinically significant fibrosis (stage F2-F4) based on the best available evidence. This Pathway is intended to be applicable in any setting where care for patients with NAFLD is provided, including primary care, endocrine, obesity medicine, and gastroenterology practices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most patients with MASLD are managed by primary care clinicians or general internists.
“MASLD impacts an estimated 25%-35% of adults worldwide, and because most patients with MASLD are managed by PCCs or general internists, the condition represents a common source of eConsult requests.20,21”
From Large Language Model–Generated Electronic Consultations: A Blinded Comparative Study of OpenEvidence and Gastroenterologist Electronic Consultations (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
The Abstract (page unavailable) says NAFLD is most often managed in primary care or endocrine clinics, supporting the primary-care part of the claim. It does not identify general internists as the alternative; it names endocrine clinics instead. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMASLD impacts an estimated 25%-35% of adults worldwide.
“MASLD impacts an estimated 25%-35% of adults worldwide, and because most patients with MASLD are managed by PCCs or general internists, the condition represents a common source of eConsult requests.20,21”
From Large Language Model–Generated Electronic Consultations: A Blinded Comparative Study of OpenEvidence and Gastroenterologist Electronic Consultations (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
The paper’s Abstract reports that approximately 37% of US adults have NAFLD, supporting the broad point that the condition is common. It does not give a worldwide estimate of 25%–35%; both the population and the stated range differ. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredVarious scientific societies have recommended clinical care pathways with an emphasis on the use of non-invasive tests and liaison between primary care/non-hepatology and hepatology settings.
“Various scienti fi c societies have recommended clinical care pathways with an emphasis on the use of non-invasive tests (NITs) and the liaison between primary care/non-hepatology and hepatology settings.”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [124]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 109 · Cited by 618
- Authors
- Kanwal, F., Shubrook, J. H., Adams, L. A., Pfotenhauer, K., Wai-Sun Wong, V., Wright, E., Abdelmalek, M. F., Harrison, S. A., Loomba, R., Mantzoros, C. S., Bugianesi, E., Eckel, R. H., Kaplan, L. M., El-Serag, H. B., & Cusi, K.
- Affiliations
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
- Touro University California (US)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Turin (IT)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cusi, Kenneth
- ORCID
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1657-1669
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8819923
- OpenAlex
- W3201482376
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 111 · 2025: 146 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 64.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP150587)
- American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
- Endocrine Society
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK120515, R01DK106419, R01DK121378, R01DK124318, U01DK061734)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (5P42ES010337)
- American Diabetes Association
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL147835)
- Intercept Pharmaceuticals
- National Cancer Institute (NCI U01 CA230997)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (5UL1TR001442)
- Obesity Society
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01AA029019)
- American Gastroenterological Association
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, care pathways, risk stratification, fibrosis staging, NAFLD screening, NAFLD diagnosis, NAFLD treatment, cardiovascular risk, metabolic comorbidities, primary care management, secondary care referral
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Decision-Making, Decision Support Techniques, Gastroenterology, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Critical Pathways, Evidence-Based Medicine, Consensus, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review