The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Role of Noninvasive Biomarkers in the Evaluation and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Expert Review
Open accessAbstract
DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update Expert Review is to provide clinicians with guidance on the use of noninvasive tests (NITs) in the evaluation and management of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD affects nearly 30% of the global population and is a growing cause of end-stage liver disease and liver-related health care resource utilization. However, only a minority of all patients with NAFLD experience a liver-related outcome. It is therefore critically important for clinicians to assess prognosis and identify those with increased risk of disease progression and negative clinical outcomes at the time of initial assessment. It is equally important to assess disease trajectory over time, particularly in response to currently available therapeutic approaches. The reference standard for assessment of prognosis and disease monitoring is histologic examination of liver biopsy specimens. There are, however, many limitations of liver biopsies and their reading that have limited their use in routine practice. The utilization of NITs facilitates risk stratification of patients and longitudinal assessment of disease progression for patients with NAFLD. This clinical update provides best practice advice based on a review of the literature on the utilization of NITs in the management of NAFLD for clinicians. Accordingly, a combination of available evidence and consensus-based expert opinion, without formal rating of the strength and quality of the evidence, was used to develop these best practice advice statements. METHODS: This Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These best practice advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these best practice advice statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: NITs can be used for risk stratification in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with NAFLD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: A Fibrosis 4 Index score <1.3 is associated with strong negative predictive value for advanced hepatic fibrosis and may be useful for exclusion of advanced hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: A combination of 2 or more NITs combining serum biomarkers and/or imaging-based biomarkers is preferred for staging and risk stratification of patients with NAFLD whose Fibrosis 4 Index score is >1.3. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Use of NITs in accordance with manufacturer's specifications (eg, not in patients with ascites or pacemakers) can minimize risk of discordant results and adverse events. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: NITs should be interpreted with context and consideration of pertinent clinical data (eg, physical examination, biochemical, radiographic, and endoscopic) to optimize positive predictive value in the identification of patients with advanced fibrosis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Liver biopsy should be considered for patients with NIT results that are indeterminate or discordant; conflict with other clinical, laboratory, or radiologic findings; or when alternative etiologies for liver disease are suspected. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Serial longitudinal monitoring using NITs for assessment of disease progression or regression may inform clinical management (ie, response to lifestyle modification or therapeutic intervention). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Patients with NAFLD and NITs results suggestive of advanced fibrosis (F3) or cirrhosis (F4) should be considered for surveillance of liver complications (eg, hepatocellular carcinoma screening and variceal screening per Baveno criteria). Patients with NAFLD and NITs suggestive of advanced hepatic fibrosis (F3) or (F4), should be monitored with serial liver stiffness measurement; vibration controlled transient elastography; or magnetic resonance elastography, given its correlation with clinically significant portal hypertension and clinical decompensation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These consultations often center around risk stratification, diagnostic workup, and management of underlying metabolic conditions.22”
From Large Language Model–Generated Electronic Consultations: A Blinded Comparative Study of OpenEvidence and Gastroenterologist Electronic Consultations (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sterling, R. K., Lissen, E., Clumeck, N., Sola, R., Correa, M. C., Montaner, J., S. Sulkowski, M., Torriani, F. J., Dieterich, D. T., Thomas, D. L., et al. (2006) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.21178 · Cited by 5,021
Younossi, Z. M., Golabi, P., Paik, J. M., Henry, A., Van Dongen, C., & Henry, L. (2023) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000000004 · Cited by 3,383
Angulo, P., Kleiner, D. E., Dam-Larsen, S., Adams, L. A., Bjornsson, E. S., Charatcharoenwitthaya, P., Mills, P. R., Keach, J. C., Lafferty, H. D., Stahler, A., et al. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.043 · Cited by 2,987
Baveno VII – Renewing consensus in portal hypertension
de Franchis, R., Bosch, J., Garcia-Tsao, G., Reiberger, T., Ripoll, C., Abraldes, J. G., Albillos, A., Baiges, A., Bajaj, J., Bañares, R., et al. (2022) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022 · Cited by 2,930
Rinella, M. E., Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A., Siddiqui, M. S., Abdelmalek, M. F., Caldwell, S., Barb, D., Kleiner, D. E., & Loomba, R. (2023) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000000323 · Cited by 2,667
Self-citationNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease - a global public health perspective
Younossi, Z. M. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.033 · Cited by 2,149
Sampling Variability of Liver Biopsy in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Ratziu, V., Charlotte, F., Heurtier, A., Gombert, S., Giral, P., Bruckert, E., Grimaldi, A., Capron, F., & Poynard, T. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.084 · Cited by 2,106
Dulai, P. S., Singh, S., Patel, J., Soni, M., Prokop, L. J., Younossi, Z., Sebastiani, G., Ekstedt, M., Hagstrom, H., Nasr, P., et al. (2017) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29085 · Cited by 1,965
Comparison of Noninvasive Markers of Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Shah, A. G., Lydecker, A. D., Murray, K. F., Tetri, B., Contos, M. J., & Sanyal, A. J. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.033 · Cited by 1,561
Self-citationNon-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography
Castéra, L., Forns, X., & Alberti, A. (2008) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.02.008 · Cited by 1,453
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Epidemiology of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
Younossi, Z. M., Kalligeros, M., & Henry, L. (2025) · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology · doi:10.3350/cmh.2024.0431 · Cited by 960
Le, P., Tatar, M., Dasarathy, S., Alkhouri, N., Herman, W. H., Taksler, G. B., Deshpande, A., Ye, W., Adekunle, O. A., McCullough, A. J., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54707 · Cited by 267
Chew, N., Mehta, A., Goh, R. S. J., Zhang, A. A. Y., Chen, Y., Chong, B., Chew, H. S. J., Shabbir, A., Brown, A. C., Dimitriadis, G. K., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.124.070535 · Cited by 191
“24 More than half of individuals with MASH are asymptomatic, and most of the cases are incidentally detected by abnormal liver function tests.”
Self-citationKokkorakis, M., Boutari, C., Hill, M. A., Kotsis, V., Loomba, R., Sanyal, A. J., & Mantzoros, C. S. (2024) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2024.155835 · Cited by 155
Self-citationFerraioli, G., Barr, R. G., Berzigotti, A., Sporea, I., Wong, V. W., Reiberger, T., Karlas, T., Thiele, M. S., Cardoso, A. C., Ayonrinde, O. T., et al. (2024) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.03.013 · Cited by 160
“The best cutoff value to rule-in advanced fi brosis with VCTE was 12 kPa [65].”
BackgroundMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and its link to cancer
Kalligeros, M., Henry, L. L., & Younossi, Z. M. (2024) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2024.156004 · Cited by 115
Byrne, C. D., Armandi, A., Pellegrinelli, V., Vidal‐Puig, A., & Bugianesi, E. (2025) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-025-01045-z · Cited by 113
“Liver biopsy should be considered for patients with NIT results that are indeterminate or discordant, conflict with other clinical, laboratory or radiological findings or when alternative aetiologies for liver disease are suspected 116 .”
Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Liu, D., Lin, Y., Song, S. J., Chu, E. S., Liu, D., Singh, S., Berman, M., Lau, H. C.-H., et al. (2024) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2024.10.008 · Cited by 67
Díaz, L. A., Arab, J. P., Idalsoaga, F. J., Perelli, J., Vega, J. A., Dirchwolf, M., Carreño, J., Samith, B., Valério, C. M., Moreira, R. O., et al. (2025) · Annals of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.aohep.2025.101903 · Cited by 72
“Posteriorly, those with indeterminate and high risk should undergo a step 2 analysis using a technique with higher sensitivity and speci fi city to determine risk and liver fi brosis stage [82] (Fig.”
InfluentialThe growing range of complications of diabetes mellitus
Hamblin, P. S., Russell, A. W., Talic, S., & Zoungas, S. (2025) · Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2024.12.006 · Cited by 52
Non-invasive testing in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
Dawod, S. M., & Brown, K. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1499013 · Cited by 48
Surveillance of the liver in type 2 diabetes: important but unfeasible?
Qadri, S. U., & Yki‐Järvinen, H. (2024) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06087-7 · Cited by 45
Zhou, X., Li, Y., Kim, S. U., Yip, T. C., Petta, S., Nakajima, A., Tsochatzis, E. A., Shi, J., Chan, W., Boursier, J., et al. (2025) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.07.011 · Cited by 36
Self-citationHudson, D., Afzaal, T., Bualbanat, H., AlRamdan, R., Howarth, N., Parthasarathy, P., Al-Darwish, A., Stephenson, E., Almahanna, Y., Hussain, M., et al. (2024) · Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1177/17562848241276334 · Cited by 39
“7,8 Given the performance of a liver biopsy is invasive and not appropriate for disease screening indications, numerous noninvasive tests have been validated in MASLD to aid in the staging and detection of clinically significant fibrosis which we will also briefly discuss in this review.”
Interindividual variability in gut microbiome mediates the efficacy of resistant starch on MASLD
Long, X., Wang, H., Lu, Y., Gao, X., Xiao, Y., Zhang, M., Guo, J., Yang, H. J., Zhang, R., Li, Q., et al. (2025) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2025.10.017 · Cited by 37
Endpoints in NASH Clinical Trials: Are We Blind in One Eye?
Lonardo, A., Ballestri, S., Mantovani, A., Targher, G., & Bril, F. (2024) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo14010040 · Cited by 34
“Several serologic, imaging, and composite noninvasive tests are available or under development to provide an alternative surrogate for the histological assessment of steatosis, fibrosis, steatohepatitis, or metabolic dysfunction [173–175].”
BackgroundLindfors, A., Strandberg, R., & Hagström, H. (2024) · The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00313-3 · Cited by 33
MetALD : New Perspectives on an Old Overlooked Disease
Ayares, G., Díaz, L. A., Idalsoaga, F. J., Alkhouri, N., Noureddin, M., Bataller, R. A., Loomba, R. S., Arab, J. P., & Arrese, M. A. (2025) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.70017 · Cited by 34
The global cardiovascular–liver–metabolic syndemic: epidemiology, trends and challenges
Chew, N., Mehta, A., Goh, R. J. L., Koh, J., Chen, Y., Chong, B., Chan, M. Y., Khan, M. S., Muthiah, M. D., Butler, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-025-01220-4 · Cited by 35
Self-citationWang, Y., Song, S. J., Jiang, Y., Lai, J. C., Wong, G. L., Wong, V. W., & Yip, T. C. (2024) · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology · doi:10.3350/cmh.2024.0246 · Cited by 32
MASLD: What We Have Learned and Where We Need to Go-A Call to Action.
Shabanan, S. H., Martins, V. F., Wolfson, T., Weeks, J., Ceriani, L., Behling, C., Chernyak, V., Kaffas, A. E., Borhani, A., Han, A.-G., et al. (2024) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.240048 · Cited by 32
Clinical trial design, biomarkers and end points in metabolic and alcohol-related liver disease
Díaz, L. A., Thiele, M. S., Louvet, A., Lee, B. P., Ajmera, V. H., Tavaglione, F., Hsu, C. L., Huang, D. Q., Pose, E., Bataller, R. A., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-025-01120-5 · Cited by 33
“MRE, although highly accurate, remains less available in resource-limited settings (for example, Latin America, Africa, and some areas of Europe and Asia), whereas VCTE offers a more cost-effective alternative suitable for routine assessment 125 (Table 4).”
Self-citationLai, J. C., Yang, B., Lee, H. W., Lin, H., Tsochatzis, E. A., Petta, S., Bugianesi, E., Yoneda, M., Zheng, M., Hagström, H., et al. (2025) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2025-334981 · Cited by 32
“12 The LSM cut-offs (in kilopascals) were set at 8, 10, 12, 15, 20 and 25 in line with those used in various guidelines to detect advanced liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension.”
Self-citationSung, S., Al‐Karaghouli, M., Tam, M., Wong, Y. J., Jayakumar, S., Davyduke, T., Ma, M. M., & Abraldeṣ, J. G. (2024) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000609 · Cited by 30
Suresh, M. G., Mohamed, S., Geetha, H. S., Prabhu, S., Trivedi, N., Ng, Z. C., Mehta, P. D., Brar, A. S., Sohal, A., Goyal, M. K., et al. (2026) · World Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.4239/wjd.v17.i2.113149 · Cited by 30
“The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is widely used due to its accessibility and cost-effectiveness; however, in T2DM it demonstrates a higher false-negative rate, particularly in individuals under 65 years of age and those with obesity, limiting sensitivity in this population[1,9,46,47].”
Zhang, G. Y., & Brandman, D. (2025) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6431 · Cited by 27
Liver fibrosis as a barometer of systemic health by gauging the risk of extrahepatic disease
Lonardo, A., Ballestri, S., Baffy, G., & Weiskirchen, R. (2024) · Metabolism and Target Organ Damage · doi:10.20517/mtod.2024.42 · Cited by 29
Misra, A., Kumar, A., Kuchay, M. S., Ghosh, A., Gulati, S., Choudhary, N. S., Dutta, D., Sharma, P., Vikram, N. K., Rastogi, A., et al. (2025) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103209 · Cited by 27
Díaz, L. A., Ajmera, V. H., Arab, J. P., Huang, D. Q., Hsu, C. L., Lee, B. P., Louvet, A., Thiele, M. S., Tavaglione, F., Tincopa, M. A., et al. (2025) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.02.017 · Cited by 28
Arai, T., Takahashi, K., Seko, Y., Toyoda, H., Hayashi, H., Yamaguchi, K., Iwaki, M., Yoneda, M., Shima, T., Fujii, H., et al. (2023) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.11.022 · Cited by 26
Non-Invasive Tests as a Replacement for Liver Biopsy in the Assessment of MASLD
Frączek, J., Sowa, A., Agopsowicz, P., Migacz, M., Dylińska-Kala, K., & Holecki, M. T. (2025) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina61040736 · Cited by 26
“…for these groups [16]. of at least two non-invasive tests (NITs), combining serum biomarkers and/or Current guidelines for the diagnosis, assessment of severity, and treatment of MASLD are widely known and available. mention the possibility of using a serum biomarker such as ELF [14,15] (Figure 2).”
InfluentialFan, W., Bradford, T. M., & Török, N. J. (2024) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.15184 · Cited by 25
Guney-Coskun, M., & Başaranoğlu, M. (2024) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v30.i43.4682 · Cited by 24
“Furthermore, identifying disease-specific bacterial markers and integrating gut microbiota manipulation into therapeutic strategies could enhance personalized treatments for MASLD patients[41].”
Hansen, C. D., Hansen, J. K., Israelsen, M. E., Andersen, P., Pikkupeura, L. M., Lindvig, K. P., Stinson, S. E., Schnefeld, H. L., Tellerup, J., Fogt, M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2025.06.020 · Cited by 23
Targeting MASLD and MASH in the US Hispanic/Latino Population: A Review
Cumpian, N. A., Gutierrez, J. A., Wu, W., & Saab, S. (2025) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.4769 · Cited by 22
Role of gut microbiota and immune cells in metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: clinical impact
Alisi, A., McCaughan, G. W., & Grønbæk, H. (2024) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-024-10674-6 · Cited by 21
“Recommendations for non-invasive tests (NIT) in clinical practice have recently been updated [83–85].”
Pecani, M., Andreozzi, P., Cangemi, R., Corica, B., Miglionico, M., Romiti, G. F., Stefanini, L., Raparelli, V., & Basili, S. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14082750 · Cited by 23
Cusi, K. J., Budd, J., Johnson, E. L., & Shubrook, J. H. (2024) · Diabetes Spectrum · doi:10.2337/dsi23-0014 · Cited by 20
“A higher value, especially if > 2.67, indicates a high, or higher, probability of advanced fi brosis (state F3 – F4) and adverse liver outcomes (17,37).”
BackgroundInfluentialCastéra, L., Alazawi, W., Bugianesi, E., Caussy, C., Federici, M., Romero‐Gómez, M., Schattenberg, J. M., Basuroy, R., Prasad, P., Estulin, D., et al. (2025) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.16224 · Cited by 19
“…stage, including liver biopsy and non-invasive tests (NITs) such as the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), when/which of these tools should be used varies, particularly in the presence of additional risk factors [19, 20].”
Bharaj, I. S., Brar, A. S., Kahlon, J., Singh, A., Hotwani, P., Kumar, V., Sohal, A., & Batta, A. (2025) · World Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.4330/wjc.v17.i6.106147 · Cited by 19
Díaz, L. A., Tavaglione, F., Mittal, N., Bettencourt, R., Amangurbanova, M., Johnson, A., Aguado, D. M., Tincopa, M. A., Loomba, R. K., Khan-Riches, A., et al. (2025) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000718 · Cited by 19
“[11,12,14]”
Liu, S., Chen, X., Jiang, X., Yin, X., Fekadu, G., Liu, C., He, Y., Chen, H., Ni, W., Wang, R., et al. (2024) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2024.03.003 · Cited by 20
Chouik, Y., Aubin, A., Maynard, M., Segrestin, B., Milot, L. M., Hervieu, V., Zoulim, F., Disse, E., Levrero, M., & Caussy, C. (2024) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.24033 · Cited by 18
“Therefore, the most recent clinical practice guidelines and expert recommendations advocate liver biopsy only in patients with discordant NITs [6, 36].”
BackgroundXiu, M., Li, B., He, L., Shi, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhou, S., Liu, Y., Wang, N., & He, J. (2025) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s499284 · Cited by 18
“1 Along with the westernization of lifestyle, the incidence of UC in developing countries is increasing.”
Liu, Y., Qin, X., Chen, T., Chen, M., Wu, L., & He, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1344924 · Cited by 18
Hormone-based pharmacotherapy for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease
Chui, Z. S. W., Xue, Y., & Xu, A. (2024) · Medical Review · doi:10.1515/mr-2024-0007 · Cited by 21
Yeh, M., Huang, J., Dai, C., Huang, C., Yu, M., & Chuang, W. (2024) · Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1080/17474124.2024.2388790 · Cited by 16
“Image-based meth-ods included vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) or LSM, shear wave elastography, and MRI-based elastography [53].”
Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension
Duarte‐Rojo, A., Patel, K., & Rockey, D. C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mog.0000000000001019 · Cited by 16
“…reduce need for biopsy for diagnosis of F2-4 and F4 in HCV infection, but has since been adopted for && fibrosis with high negative predictive value (NPV), but require additional NILDA to improve positive predictive value (PPV) for ‘ruling’-in advanced 150 www.co-gastroenterology.com fibrosis [14].”
BackgroundHuang, J., Chang, T., Yeh, M., Shen, F., Tai, C., Chen, J., Huang, Y., Hsu, C., Cheng, P., Lin, C., et al. (2024) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000571 · Cited by 15
“[54] The serological markers included FIB-4 index, AST/ALT ratio, AST-to-platelet ratio index, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score, enhanced liver fibrosis test, and FibroMeter MASLD.”
BackgroundMethodDetecting at-risk steatotic liver disease and liver fibrosis in the community
Adams, L. A., Thiele, M. S., & Tsochatzis, E. A. (2025) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000001400 · Cited by 14
A Precision Medicine Guided Approach to the Utilization of Biomarkers in MASLD
Thakral, N., Desalegn, H., Díaz, L. A., Cabrera, D., Loomba, R. S., Arrese, M. A., & Arab, J. P. (2024) · Seminars in Liver Disease · doi:10.1055/a-2364-2928 · Cited by 14
“103,104 The MEFIB index has additionally proven superior to a previously suggested FAST index (FIB-4, AST) in a head-to-head trial.”
Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Steatotic Liver Disease and Its Newly Proposed Subclassification
Song, B. G., Kim, A., Goh, M. J., Kang, W., Gwak, G., Paik, Y., Choi, M. S., Lee, J. H., & Sinn, D. H. (2024) · Liver Cancer · doi:10.1159/000538301 · Cited by 13
“The FIB-4 index was used to assess the severity of fi brosis and to classify participants with SLD into two groups: high-intermediate (FIB-4 ≥ 1.3) and low-probability (FIB-4 1.3) advanced fi brosis [13, 14].”
MethodInfluentialAllen, A. M., Lazarus, J. V., Alkhouri, N., Noureddin, M., Wong, V. W., Tsochatzis, E. A., de Avila, L., Racila, A., Nader, F., Mark, H. E., et al. (2025) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000678 · Cited by 12
Aldana, S. I., Midya, V., Betanzos‐Robledo, L., Yao, M., Alcala, C. S., Andra, S. S., Arora, M., Calafat, A. M., Chu, J., Deierlein, A. L., et al. (2024) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.11.050 · Cited by 12
Kokkorakis, M., Folkertsma, P., Forte, J. C., Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R., van Dam, S., & Mantzoros, C. S. (2024) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2024.156047 · Cited by 13
Golgi protein 73 in liver fibrosis
Szternel, Ł., Sobucki, B., Wieprzycka, L., Krintus, M., & Panteghini, M. (2024) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2024.119999 · Cited by 11
Han, Y., Tang, J., Wu, N., Li, Z., Ren, H. G., Hu, P., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2024.156096 · Cited by 11
Lean MASLD and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review
Lebovics, N., Heering, G., Frishman, W. H., & Lebovics, E. (2025) · Cardiology in Review · doi:10.1097/crd.0000000000000893 · Cited by 11
Concepción‐Zavaleta, M. J., Fuentes‐Mendoza, J. M., Yovera, J. G. G., Ruvalcaba-Barbosa, G. Y., Cura-Rodríguez, L. D., González-Rodríguez, J. S., Urteaga, L. A. C., Pérez-Reyes, A. I., Aldave, J. E. Q., & Paz‐Ibarra, J. (2025) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v31.i37.111435 · Cited by 11
“Its performance is age-dependent, with reduced sensitivity in younger adults and reduced specificity in the elderly[33].”
Performance of novel collagen turnover biomarkers to detect increased liver stiffness in MASLD
Hegmar, H., Wiggers, T., Nasr, P., Vessby, J., Kechagias, S., Nyhlin, N., Marschall, H., Borssén, Å. D., Strandberg, R., Karsdal, M. A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.13813 · Cited by 10
Song, B. G., Goh, M. J., Kang, W., Gwak, G., Paik, Y., Choi, M. S., Lee, J. H., & Sinn, D. H. (2024) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.18402 · Cited by 10
“Patients with SLD but without metabolic dysfunction or increased alcohol intake were diagnosed with cryptogenic SLD [17, 18].”
Langmann, F., Ibsen, D. B., Johnston, L., Perez‐Cornago, A., & Dahm, C. C. (2024) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.70004 · Cited by 9
Muñoz‐Espinosa, L. E., Torre, A., Cisneros, L., Montalvo, I., Malé, R., Mejía, S., Aguilar, J. R., Lizardi, J., Zuñiga‐Noriega, J., Eugenia Icaza, M., et al. (2025) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.70131 · Cited by 10
“Other relevant findings are the significant improvement in platelet count, bilirubin, and albumin values commonly used as part of noninvasive biological tests for suspecting the presence of ALF [26].”
Clinical Assessment of People With Obesity: Focus on Adiposity-Related Multimorbidity
Bianchettin, R. G., Gawey, B. J., Acosta, A. J., Borlaug, B. A., Caples, S. M., Collazo–Clavell, M. L., Clark, M. M., Lara-Breitinger, K. M., Lerman, A., Lerman, L. O., et al. (2025) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.02.021 · Cited by 13
Kim, A., Kang, D., Choi, S. C., Cho, J., Sinn, D. H., & Gwak, G. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301126 · Cited by 9
“We categorized participants as having a low likelihood of liver fibrosis (FIB-4 score < 1.3) and an intermediate or high likelihood of liver fibrosis ( � 1.3) [10].”
MethodInfluentialCoşkun, M., Şendur, H. N., Babayeva, A., Cerit, M. N., Cerit, E. T., Yalçın, M. M., Altınova, A. E., Aktürk, M., Karakoç, M. A., & Törüner, F. B. (2024) · Journal of Endocrinological Investigation · doi:10.1007/s40618-024-02384-5 · Cited by 9
Panteghini, M., & Wielgosz, R. I. (2025) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2025-0401 · Cited by 9
“…as the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index (variables in the model: age, AST, ALT, and platelet count), are now recommended by several clinical organizations as a fi rst-line non-invasive testing tools for assessing the presence of advanced liver fi brosis in patients at high risk for this condition [32, 33].”
The relationship between hepatic steatosis index and hypertension: NHANES 2011–2018
Zhang, W., Gao, B., Wang, Y., Cao, Y., & Wang, J. (2025) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-025-04744-2 · Cited by 9
“Imaging-based approaches, such as ultrasound, exhibit limited sensitivity for detecting mild steatosis and are highly operator-dependent [17].”
Aitharaju, V., Ragheb, J. G., Firkins, S. A., Patel, R., & Simons-Linares, C. R. (2024) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2024.09.012 · Cited by 8
Velji-Ibrahim, J., Woodard, J. S., Alden, J., & Abrams, G. A. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0000000000002132 · Cited by 8
Trifylli, E.-M., Angelakis, A., Kriebardis, A. G., Papadopoulos, N., Fortis, S. P., Pantazatou, V., Koskinas, J. S., Kranidioti, H., Koustas, E., Sarantis, P., et al. (2025) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v31.i22.106937 · Cited by 8
Nakamura, A., Yoshimura, T., Ichikawa, T., & Okuyama, K. (2024) · Annals of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101507 · Cited by 7
Volčanšek, Š., Janež, A., Rizzo, M., & Muzurović, E. M. (2024) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108875 · Cited by 7
Woodard, J. S., Velji-Ibrahim, J., & Abrams, G. A. (2024) · Diseases · doi:10.3390/diseases12110288 · Cited by 8
“…of the following metabolic risk factors or on medication: BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 or a waist circumference > 94 cm (male) or 80 cm (female), fasting glucose 100 mg/dL or HbA1 c ≥ 5.7% or type 2 diabetes, blood pressure ≥ 130/85, triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL, or HDL ≤ 40 mg/dL (men) or ≤ 50 mg/dL (women) [3].”
InfluentialTalha, M., Ali, M. H., Nadeem, Z. A., Akram, U., Saravanan, P. B., & Khalid, M. H. A. (2024) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000002892 · Cited by 7
“These tests in turn can help in the appropriate identification of the candidate for treatment [27,32,33].”
Schonfeld, E. A., Kierans, A. S., Fox, R. K., & Brandman, D. (2025) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2024.12.014 · Cited by 7
Hernandez, R., García-Rodríguez, N., Arriaga, M. A., Pérez, R., Bala, A. A., Leandro, A., Diego, V. P., Almeida, M., Parsons, J., Manusov, E., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1513598 · Cited by 7
Thallapureddy, K., Twitchell, D., Ott, K., Pedicone, L. D., Owo, C., Kumar, N., Gelfond, J., Shankar, N., Goros, M. W., Kwok, D., et al. (2025) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000042016 · Cited by 7
Xiao, L., Zeng, L., Wang, J., Hong, C., Zhang, Z., Wu, C., Cui, H., Li, Y., Li, R., Liang, S., et al. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202410527 · Cited by 7
Abaalkhail, F. A., Sanai, F. M., Alswat, K., Alzanbagi, A., Al-Jedai, A. H., Alshehri, A., Alfadda, A. A., Alghamdi, H., Almadi, M. A., AlEissa, M., et al. (2025) · Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.4103/sjg.sjg_199_25 · Cited by 8
Hernández-Almonacid, P. G., & Marín-Quintero, X. (2026) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.111737 · Cited by 8
“Given that the degree of fibrosis is the primary predictor of adverse outcomes, current diagnostic algorithms prioritize its early detection[27].”
Disease modifiers and novel markers in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma
Mak, L. (2024) · Journal of Liver Cancer · doi:10.17998/jlc.2024.08.03 · Cited by 7
“88 While LSM and ELF are widely available in many clinical settings, and endorsed in clinical practice guidelines for other liver diseases, 89,90 M2BPGi remains to be a research tool.”
MethodDeb, R., Goswami, S., Sengupta, N., Baidya, A., Khare, V. R., Datta, J., Das, M., & Ray, D. (2025) · Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.4103/ijem.ijem_457_24 · Cited by 6
Sukocheva, O. A., Ow, T., Harding, D., Mire, M. L., & Tse, E. (2025) · World Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.4254/wjh.v17.i7.106675 · Cited by 6
Djeagou, A., Gunukula, K., Sermani, A., & Vaspari, S. K. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.95288 · Cited by 8
Biomarkers in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
De, A., Chalasani, N., & Duseja, A. K. (2025) · Gastroenterology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2025.09.003 · Cited by 6
Metabolic reprogramming in fibrosis-related diseases: underlying mechanisms and therapeutics
Feng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, X., & Chen, C. (2026) · Molecular Biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-026-00490-9 · Cited by 7
“Liver fibrosis is a strong predictor of adverse hepatic and cardiovascular outcomes [200].”
Ananchuensook, P., Moonlisarn, K., Boonkaew, B., Bunchorntavakul, C., & Tangkijvanich, P. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13020415 · Cited by 5
“The widely used fibrosis models in patients with MASLD that include a combination of indirect biomarkers are the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/platelet ratio index (APRI), and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) [6].”
Chang, K.-C., Lin, T., Wang, T., Chuang, S.-L., Lee, C.-C., Wu, C., Lin, L., Huang, K., & Lin, L. (2025) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.3761 · Cited by 5
“…FIB-4 may serve as a prognostic factor in patients with cardiovascular diseases including heart failure, atrial fibrillation and isolated TR. 9, 1 6,25 Considering the AST/ALT ratio and the prognostic impact of thrombocytopenia in cardiovascular disease, FIB-4 is of great potential for a…”
Liu, C., Li, C., Fu, J., Bai, L., Wang, M., Song, P., & Zheng, M. (2025) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/s12876-025-04195-1 · Cited by 5
“However, ultrasound is safe, affordable, has satisfactory specificity, and is sufficiently sensitive in large population-based epidemiological studies [89].”
Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
Ribeiro, T. C. R., Soares, V. D. P. B., Fabri, J. C., & Ramos, L. E. D. A. (2026) · World Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111534 · Cited by 5
Ghodrati, F., Zhang, A. B., & Mahmud, N. (2026) · Gastroenterology report · doi:10.1093/gastro/goag006 · Cited by 6
“Current US and European guidelines recommend using a stepwise approach with the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) followed by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) to stage fibrosis and risk stratify MASLD patients [14, 23, 59–61].”
Cell-free DNA fragmentomes for noninvasive detection of liver cirrhosis and other diseases
Annapragada, A. V., Foda, Z. H., Orjuela, H., Norton, C., Koul, S., Niknafs, N., Short, S. B., Boyapati, K., Bartolomucci, A. L., Mathios, D., et al. (2026) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adw2603 · Cited by 6
Gee, M. F. W., Fonstad, R. K., Vol, E. B. D., Brown, C., Feld, J. J., Patel, K., & Sanyal, A. J. (2026) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000931 · Cited by 5
“[8] 25] However, recent studies have proposed additional ELF thresholds above and below those currently recommended to improve the risk stratification of patients.”
Self-citationGál, A. R., Szokodi, I., Vizvári, Z., Győrfi, N., Vereczkei, A. G., Petykó, Z., Karádi, Z., & Tóth, A. (2026) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox15060710 · Cited by 6
“…when used to assess liver fibrosis in individuals at increased risk, such as those with type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity with metabolic complications, or ≥ 2 cardiometabolic risk factors, or when combined with non-invasive fibrosis scores, including the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) [203,207,208].”
Younossi, Z. M., Estep, J. M., Felix, S. C., Lam, B. P., Younossi, Z., Racila, A., & Stepanova, M. (2024) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111960 · Cited by 5
Hoang, T., Lee, J., Kim, B. H., Cho, Y., & Kim, J. (2025) · Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.4143/crt.2024.876 · Cited by 6
“…by calculating the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) as follows: In a meta-analysis of 10 studies including 2,759 patients, the performance of FIB-4 for the absence of significant fibrosis (F2) with a threshold in the 1.24-1.45 range demonstrated a mean sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 71.2% [15,16].”
InfluentialQuantitative Mapping of Fibrotic Tissue Mechanics via Brillouin Spectroscopy
Cheburkanov, V. D., Jung, S., Berezin, M. Y., & Yakovlev, V. V. (2025) · Journal of Biophotonics · doi:10.1002/jbio.202500489 · Cited by 4
Ebiai, R., McNair, J., Shuaibi, S. N., Memon, A. I., Desai, A., Fort, L. B., Seoane, L., Girgrah, N., & Therapondos, G. (2025) · Gastro Hep Advances · doi:10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100857 · Cited by 5
“5,6 Multiple barriers may contribute to suboptimal care for patients with hepatic steatosis, including limited awareness of MASLD progression, variable adoption of NITs, and delays or errors introduced by manual review of imaging reports and labs.”
Krintus, M., & Panteghini, M. (2025) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf193 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wattacheril, J. J., Abdelmalek, M. F., Lim, J. K., & Sanyal, A. J.
- Affiliations
- NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wattacheril, Julia J.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1080-1088
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385567515
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 47.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Allergan
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Keywords
- non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, non-invasive biomarkers, non-invasive tests, liver fibrosis, NAFLD fibrosis score, liver biopsy limitations, risk stratification, disease progression monitoring, liver disease staging, serum biomarkers, NAFLD risk prediction, NAFLD management
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Biomarkers, Disease Progression, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review