The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound Probes: The New Generation of POCUS
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in ultrasound technology have made ultrasound equipment more versatile, portable, and accessible than ever. Modern handheld, ultra-portable ultrasound devices have been developed by multiple companies and are contributing to make bedside ultrasound evaluation a practice available to all physicians. The significance of making point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) a common practice that all physicians eventually can use in the evaluation of their patients is changing the way medicine is practiced, allowing physicians to quickly obtain valuable information to complement the traditional physical examination. Despite the proven benefits of using bedside ultrasound imaging as a part of the patient evaluation and for procedure guidance, adoption of this technology still is not widespread among anesthesiology clinicians nor is there uniform teaching of ultrasound skills to anesthesia residents and faculty. Among obstacles that have been identified as precluding achievement of the goal of widespread utilization of POCUS among anesthesia professionals and trainees, are the availability of equipment for all physicians when it is needed and lack of instructor supervision for trainees who desire to use ultrasound but do not always have an instructor knowledgeable in POCUS with them when an ultrasound examination is warranted. Herein, the characteristics, advantages, and limitations of available ultra-portable, handheld ultrasound devices are analyzed, with a focus on the Butterfly iQ (Butterfly Network, Inc, Guilford, CT) pocket probe, which is available at the authors’ institution, and how some of its features, such as the capacity to emulate multiple transducers and its cloud-sharing and teleguidance technology, may contribute to increase the availability and use of POCUS by anesthesia clinicians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager
Hu, H., Huang, H., Li, M., Gao, X., Yin, L., Qi, R., Wu, R. S., Chen, X., Ma, Y., Shi, K., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05498-z · Cited by 644
Díaz-Gómez, J. L., Mayo, P. H., & Koenig, S. J. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1916062 · Cited by 499
The current and future state of AI interpretation of medical images
Rajpurkar, P., & Lungren, M. P. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2301725 · Cited by 443
Continuous monitoring of deep-tissue haemodynamics with stretchable ultrasonic phased arrays
Wang, C., Qi, B., Lin, M., Zhang, Z., Makihata, M., Liu, B., Zhou, S., Huang, Y.-H., Hu, H., Gu, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00763-4 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Baribeau, Y., Sharkey, A., Chaudhary, O., Krumm, S., Fatima, H., Mahmood, F., & Matyal, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3139-3145
- ISSN
- 1053-0770 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3041009681
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound Probes: The New Generation of POCUS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.004
- The paper
- Baribeau, Y., Sharkey, A., Chaudhary, O., Krumm, S., Fatima, H., Mahmood, F., & Matyal, R. (2020). Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound Probes: The New Generation of POCUS. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.