Cited by 95Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The Effects of Simulation on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking Scores: A Quantitative Study

Sullivan-Mann, Joann, Perron, Carrie A., Fellner, Angela N.·2009·Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.nainr.2009.03.006

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan-Mann, J., Perron, C. A., & Fellner, A. N.
Affiliations
  • Good Samaritan Hospital (US)
  • Northern Kentucky University (US)
Corresponding author
Sullivan-Mann, Joann
Venue
Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
111-116
ISSN
1527-3369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986114117
Cited by
95
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
clinical simulation, critical thinking, nursing students, associate degree nursing, simulation scenarios, nursing education, medical-surgical nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review