Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 17Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesCongenital Heart Disease StudiesNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preoperative cardiopulmonary evaluation in specific neonatal surgery

Petroze, Robin T., Puligandla, Pramod S.·2019·Seminars in Pediatric Surgery

Abstract

Preoperative assessment of surgical neonates often relates to issues of prematurity, low birth weight, or associated malformations. This review explores the preoperative cardiopulmonary evaluation in specific newborn surgical populations, the role of echocardiography in congenital diaphragmatic hernia perioperative management, the impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the ex-preterm surgical neonate and a brief discussion on the risk of general anesthesia and specific anesthetic considerations for any surgical neonate. Newborns with congenital anomalies requiring early general surgical intervention should have an assessment for congenital heart disease. In the asymptomatic neonate, a thorough physical exam may be sufficient preoperatively. Neonates born with esophageal atresia or anorectal malformations should have a full evaluation for VACTERL associations. Initial echocardiography in congenital diaphragmatic hernia is used to evaluate anatomy, but there is emerging evidence to suggest the use of echocardiography in the ongoing surveillance of CDH to influence the timing of surgical intervention. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia is present in up to 40% of ex-premature neonates and increases the risk of postoperative apneas and need for ventilatory support. However, all surgical neonates have an increased risk of post-operative apneas, and the need for surgical intervention should be balanced with the risk of general anesthesia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2019.01.002

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Doyle, 2017, Late (>7 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Petroze, R. T., & Puligandla, P. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Montreal Children's Hospital (CA)
Venue
Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
3-10
ISSN
1055-8586 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910369124
Cited by
17
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Pediatric Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
surgical neonates, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, echocardiography, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, general anesthesia risks, postoperative apnea, congenital heart disease, VACTERL association, esophageal atresia, anorectal malformation, timing of surgery
MeSH terms
Heart Diseases, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Lung Diseases, Preoperative Care, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.