Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Plus Nadolol and Sucralfate Compared With Ligation Alone for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Lo, Gin-Ho, Lai, Kwok-Hung, Cheng, Jin-Shiung, Chen, Mei-Hsiu, Huang, Hui-Chun, Hsu, Ping-I, Lin, Chiun-Ku·2000·Hepatology

Abstract

Both β-blockers and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) have proven to be valuable alternatives to sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. Sucralfate is a mucosal protector. The effects of combinations of β-blocker, band ligation, and sucralfate (triple therapy) remain unknown. A total of 122 patients with a history of esophageal variceal bleeding were randomized to receive EVL only (group A, 62 patients) or triple therapy (group B, 60 patients). The procedure for the triple therapy included ligation with the addition of sucralfate granules until variceal obliteration. In addition, nadolol was administered during the course of the study or until death. After a median follow-up of 21 months, recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding developed in 29 patients (47%) in group A and 14 patients (23%) in group B (P = .005). Recurrent bleeding from esophagogastric varices occurred in 18 patients in group A and 7 patients in group B (P = .001). Twenty-one patients in group A (50%) and 12 patients (26%) in group B experienced variceal recurrence after variceal obliteration (P < .05). Treatment failure occurred in 11 patients (18%) in group A and in 4 patients (7%) in group B (P = .05). Twenty patients from group A and 10 patients from group B died (P = .08); 9 and 4 of these deaths, respectively, were attributed to variceal hemorrhage (P = .26). The combination of ligation, nadolol, and sucralfate (triple therapy) proved more effective than banding ligation alone in terms of prevention of variceal recurrence and upper gastrointestinal rebleeding as well as variceal rebleeding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/jhep.2000.16236

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Lo, G.-H., Lai, K.-H., Cheng, J.-S., Chen, M.-H., Huang, H.-C., Hsu, P.-I., & Lin, C.-K.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2000-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
461-465
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967484100
Cited by
276
References
15
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Plus Nadolol and Sucralfate Compared With Ligation Alone for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jhep.2000.16236
The paper
Lo, G.-H., Lai, K.-H., Cheng, J.-S., Chen, M.-H., Huang, H.-C., Hsu, P.-I., & Lin, C.-K. (2000). Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Plus Nadolol and Sucralfate Compared With Ligation Alone for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2000.16236

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.