The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation with histological grading
Open accessAbstract
Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been used for the detection of hepatic tumors. However, little is known about this technique in relation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to investigate whether SPIO-enhanced MR imaging can be useful in assessing histological grades of HCC. The authors studied histologically proven tumors including 31 HCCs and 6 dysplastic nodules. The ratio of the Kupffer-cell count in the tumorous tissue relative to that in the nontumorous tissue (Kupffer-cell-count ratio) decreased as HCCs became less well differentiated. The ratio of the intensity of the tumorous lesion to that of the nontumorous area on SPIO-enhanced MR images (SPIO intensity ratio) correlated inversely with Kupffer-cell-count ratio in HCCs and dysplastic nodules (r = −.826, P< .001) and increased as the degree of differentiation of HCCs decreased, indicating that the uptake of SPIO in HCCs decreased as the degree of differentiation of HCCs declined. All of the dysplastic nodules and some well-differentiated HCCs showed hypointense or isointense enhancement, relative to the surrounding liver parenchyma, indicating greater or similar uptake of SPIO in the tumor when compared with nontumorous areas. These results suggest that SPIO-enhanced MR imaging reflects Kupffer-cell numbers in HCCs and dysplastic nodules, and is useful for estimation of histological grading in HCCs, although uncertainties persist in differentiating dysplastic nodules from well-differentiated HCCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kudo, M., Kawamura, Y., Hasegawa, K., Tateishi, R., Kariyama, K., Shiina, S., Toyoda, H., Imai, Y., Hiraoka, A., Ikeda, M., et al. (2021) · Liver Cancer · doi:10.1159/000514174 · Cited by 678
Self-citationSuperparamagnetic iron oxide based MRI contrast agents: Current status of clinical application.
Wáng, Y. X. J. (2011) · PubMed · doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2011.08.03 · Cited by 613
Burrel, M., Llovet, J. M., Ayuso, C., Iglesias, C., Sala, M., Miquel, R., Caralt, T., Ayuso, J. R., Solé, M., Sanchez, M., et al. (2003) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840380430 · Cited by 451
Imaging Study of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Usefulness of Gadoxetic Acid–enhanced MR Imaging
Sano, K., Ichikawa, T., Motosugi, U., Sou, H., Muhi, A. M., Matsuda, M., Nakano, M., Sakamoto, M., Nakazawa, T., Asakawa, M., et al. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11101840 · Cited by 353
Iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted cancer imaging and diagnostics
Rosen, J. E., Chan, L., Shieh, D.-B., & Gu, F. X. (2012) · Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2011.08.017 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Imai, Y., Murakami, T., Yoshida, S., Nishikawa, M., Ohsawa, M., Tokunaga, K., Murata, M., Shibata, K., Zushi, S., Kurokawa, M., Yonezawa, T., Kawata, S., Takamura, M., Nagano, H., Sakon, M., Monden, M., Wakasa, K., & Nakamura, H.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-212
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988089378
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation with histological grading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jhep.2000.9113
- The paper
- Imai, Y., Murakami, T., Yoshida, S., Nishikawa, M., Ohsawa, M., Tokunaga, K., Murata, M., Shibata, K., Zushi, S., Kurokawa, M., Yonezawa, T., Kawata, S., Takamura, M., Nagano, H., Sakon, M., Monden, M., Wakasa, K., & Nakamura, H. (2000). Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation with histological grading. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2000.9113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.