The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hemodynamic Response to Pharmacological Treatment of Portal Hypertension and Long–Term Prognosis of Cirrhosis
Abstract
In cirrhotic patients under pharmacologic treatment for portal hypertension, a reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of ≥20% of baseline or to ≤12 mm Hg markedly reduces the risk of variceal rebleeding. This study was aimed at evaluating whether these hemodynamic targets also prevent other complications of portal hypertension and improve long–term survival. One hundred five cirrhotic patients included in prospective trials for the prevention of variceal rebleeding were studied. Seventy–three of the patients had 2 separate HVPG measurements, at baseline and under pharmacologic therapy with propranolol ± isosorbide mononitrate. Patients were followed for up to 8 years. Survival and risk of developing portal hypertension–related complications were compared between responders and nonresponders. Twenty–eight patients showed a reduction of HVPG ≥20% of baseline or to ≤12 mm Hg (responders), and 45 patients were nonresponders. Nonresponders had a significantly greater risk of developing variceal rebleeding (P = .013), ascites (P = .025), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (P = .003), hepatorenal syndrome (P = .026), and hepatic encephalopathy (P = .024) than responders. Eight–year cumulative probability of survival was significantly lower in nonresponders than in responders (52% vs. 95%, respectively, P = .003). At multivariate analysis, being a nonresponder was independently associated with the risk of developing rebleeding, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and lower survival. In conclusion, in cirrhotic patients receiving pharmacologic treatment for prevention of variceal rebleeding, a decrease in HVPG ≥20% or to ≤12 mm Hg is associated with a marked reduction in the long–term risk of developing complications of portal hypertension and with improved survival. (Hepatology 2003;37:902–908.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
D'Amico, G., Garcia-Tsao, G., & Pagliaro, L. (2006) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013 · Cited by 2,687
Garcia‐Tsao, G., Abraldes, J. G., Berzigotti, A., & Bosch, J. (2017) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.28906 · Cited by 2,154
Self-citationGinès, P., Krag, A., Abraldes, J. G., Solà, E., Fabrellas, N., & Kamath, P. S. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01374-x · Cited by 1,663
Self-citationRipoll, C., Groszmann, R., Garcia–Tsao, G., Grace, N., Burroughs, A., Planas, R., Escorsell, A., Garcia–Pagan, J. C., Makuch, R., Patch, D., et al. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.024 · Cited by 1,183
Self-citationAbraldes, J. G., Villanueva, C., Aracil, C., Turnes, J., Hernandez-Guerra, M., Genesca, J., Rodriguez, M., Castellote, J., García-Pagán, J. C., Torres, F., et al. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.004 · Cited by 339
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraldes, J. G., Tarantino, I., Turnes, J., Garcia-Pagan, J. C., Rodés, J., & Bosch, J.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 902-908
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112665890
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemodynamic Response to Pharmacological Treatment of Portal Hypertension and Long–Term Prognosis of Cirrhosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jhep.2003.50133
- The paper
- Abraldes, J. G., Tarantino, I., Turnes, J., Garcia-Pagan, J. C., Rodés, J., & Bosch, J. (2003). Hemodynamic Response to Pharmacological Treatment of Portal Hypertension and Long–Term Prognosis of Cirrhosis. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.