Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Body mass index as a predictor of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors

Rinella, Mary E., Alonso, Estella, Rao, Sambasiva, Whitington, Peter, Fryer, Jonathan, Abecassis, Michael, Superina, Riccardo, Flamm, Steven L., Blei, Andres T.·2001·Liver Transplantation

Abstract

Evaluation of the living donor for liver transplantation is a complex process involving such invasive studies as liver biopsy and angiography. It is important to establish the likelihood and extent of hepatic steatosis in living donors by clinical, imaging, and biochemical parameters to avoid performing a liver biopsy, if possible. In this study, the predictive value of body mass index (BMI), liver chemistry tests, and imaging studies was compared with liver histological examination in 33 potential living donors. Patients were grouped and compared based on their BMI (<25, 25 to 28, >28). No patient with a BMI less than 25 had hepatic steatosis. Of patients with a BMI of 25 to 28, steatosis was found on biopsy in 3 of 9 patients. Thirteen of 17 patients (76%) with a BMI greater than 28 had hepatic steatosis on liver biopsy. There was a significant correlation between BMI and overall grade of steatosis (R = 0.49). All subjects with steatosis detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) had steatosis on biopsy, and all but 2 such patients had greater than 10% steatosis on biopsy. Conversely, 30% of patients in the MRI group and 24% of patients in the CT group failed to show hepatic steatosis when it was present on biopsy. Thus, it appears that liver biopsy could be avoided in subjects with a normal BMI and absence of risk factors. Individuals with a high BMI should undergo liver biopsy because biochemical and imaging data are currently inadequate to determine the extent of steatosis. Future studies should aim at improving the sensitivity of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of steatosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/jlts.2001.23787

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Rinella, M. E., Alonso, E., Rao, S., Whitington, P., Fryer, J., Abecassis, M., Superina, R., Flamm, S. L., & Blei, A. T.
Venue
Liver Transplantation
Published
2001-05
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
409-414
ISSN
1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975952171
Cited by
259
References
27
FWCI
12.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body mass index as a predictor of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jlts.2001.23787
The paper
Rinella, M. E., Alonso, E., Rao, S., Whitington, P., Fryer, J., Abecassis, M., Superina, R., Flamm, S. L., & Blei, A. T. (2001). Body mass index as a predictor of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors. Liver Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1053/jlts.2001.23787

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.