The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list
Abstract
A major obstacle for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is tumor growth resulting in dropout from the waiting list for OLT. There is a paucity of data on survival according to intention-to-treat analysis and the rate of dropout from the waiting list for OLT among patients with HCC. To further evaluate these issues, we analyzed the outcome of 46 consecutive patients with HCC listed for OLT between January 1998 and January 2001. Exclusion criteria for OLT were tumor size greater than 5 cm for one to three lesions or four lesions or greater of any size. Twenty-one patients underwent OLT. There were 11 dropouts because of tumor progression and six deaths, including three deaths after dropout. Kaplan-Meier 1- and 2-year intention-to-treat survival rates were 91.7% and 72.6%, respectively. Monthly dropout rates were 0% from 0 to 3 months, 1.5% from 3 to 6 months, 1.0% from 6 to 9 months, 4.9% from 9 to 12 months, and 5.6% from 12 to 15 months. One dropout occurred beyond 15 months among 4 patients remaining at risk. Cumulative probabilities for dropout at 6, 12, and 24 months were 7.3%, 25.3%, and 43.6%, respectively. Predictors for dropout included two or three tumor nodules or a solitary lesion greater than 3 cm at initial presentation and previous hepatic resection. Our results support recent changes in the scheme of organ allocation aimed at reducing the dropout rate and improving outcome for patients with HCC awaiting OLT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices
Pugh, R. N. H., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Dawson, J. L., Pietroni, M. C., & Williams, R. (1973) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800600817 · Cited by 7,941
Cited by
Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan
Freeman, R. B., Wiesner, R. H., Edwards, E., Harper, A., Merion, R., & Wolfe, R. (2004) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.20024 · Cited by 434
Korean Liver Cancer Association, K., & National Cancer Center, N. (2019) · Gut and Liver · doi:10.5009/gnl19024 · Cited by 391
Lu, D. S. K., Yu, N. C., Raman, S. S., Lassman, C., Tong, M. J., Britten, C., Durazo, F., Saab, S., Han, S., Finn, R., et al. (2005) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20688 · Cited by 355
Cherqui, D., Laurent, A., Mocellin, N., Tayar, C., Luciani, A., Van Nhieu, J. T., Decaens, T., Hurtova, M., Memeo, R., Mallat, A., et al. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bd582b · Cited by 278
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: The impact of the MELD allocation policy
Wiesner, R. H., Freeman, R. B., & Mulligan, D. C. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.040 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, F. Y., Bass, N. M., Nikolai, B., Davern, T. J., Kerlan, R., Wu, V., Ascher, N. L., & Roberts, J. P.
- Venue
- Liver Transplantation
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 873-883
- ISSN
- 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044641518
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jlts.2002.34923
- The paper
- Yao, F. Y., Bass, N. M., Nikolai, B., Davern, T. J., Kerlan, R., Wu, V., Ascher, N. L., & Roberts, J. P. (2002). Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list. Liver Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1053/jlts.2002.34923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.