The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liver Resection for Transplantable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Long-Term Survival and Role of Secondary Liver Transplantation
Abstract
In Brief Background/Purpose: Liver transplantation (LT) is the best theoretical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) fulfilling the Milan criteria (TNM stages 1–2). However, LT is limited by organ availability and tumor progression on the waiting list. Liver resection (LR) may represent an alternative in these patients. The aim of this study is to report the results of LR in transplantable patients. Patients: From 1990 to 2007, 274 patients underwent liver resection for HCC. Sixty-seven (24%) met the Milan criteria on pathologic study of the specimen. Ten were TNM stage 1 and 57 stage 2 and all had chronic liver disease. There were 56 men and 11 women with a mean age of 63. LR included 12 major hepatectomies, 14 bisegmentectomies, 14 segmentectomies, and 27 nonanatomic resections. Thirty-seven resections were performed through a laparoscopic approach and there were only 8 open resections since 1998. Results: Three patients died postoperatively (4.5%), none after laparoscopic resection. Morbidity rate was 34%. After a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 36 patients (54%) developed intrahepatic tumor recurrence. Twenty-eight (77%) were again transplantable of which 16 (44%) were transplanted. Two additional patients underwent pre-emptive LT (ie before recurrence). When considering 44 patients <65 years at the time of resection (ie upper age limit for LT), the rates of recurrence, transplantable recurrence, and intention to treat salvage transplantation (patients with transplantable recurrence actually transplanted) were 59%, 80%, and 61%, respectively. Overall and disease free 5-year survival rates were 72% and 44%, respectively. Survival was not influenced by TNM stage 1 or 2, AFP level, tumor differentiation, or the presence microscopic vascular invasion. Survival after salvage LT was 70% and 87% when calculated from the date of LT and LR, respectively. Conclusion: LR for small solitary HCC in compensated cirrhosis yields an overall survival rate comparable to upfront LT. Despite a significant recurrence rate, close imaging monitoring after resection allows salvage LT in 61% of patients with recurrence on intention to treat analysis. Sixty-seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, meeting the Milan criteria, underwent liver resection with overall and disease free 5-year survival rates of 72% and 44%, respectively. Secondary transplantation was possible in 61% of patients with recurrence, who were <65 years old at resection. In an era of organ shortage, resection offers an efficient intent to treat alternative to transplantation in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma and compensated liver disease and preserves the possibility of salvage transplantation in case of recurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dindo, D., Demartines, N., & Clavien, P.-A. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae · Cited by 31,378
Mazzaferro, V., Regalia, E., Doci, R., Andreola, S., Pulvirenti, A., Bozzetti, F., Montalto, F., Ammatuna, M., Morabito, A., & Gennari, L. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199603143341104 · Cited by 7,186
Llovet, J. M., Burroughs, A., & Bruix, J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14964-1 · Cited by 3,608
Primary liver cancer: Worldwide incidence and trends
Bosch, F. X., Ribes, J., Díaz, M., & Cléries, R. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.011 · Cited by 2,477
Llovet, J. M., Fuster, J., & Bruix, J. (1999) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.510300629 · Cited by 1,708
Liver resection for colorectal metastases.
Fong, Y., Cohen, A. M., Fortner, J. G., Enker, W. E., Turnbull, A. D., Coit, D. G., Marrero, A. M., Prasad, M., Blumgart, L. H., & Brennan, M. F. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.938 · Cited by 1,284
Liver Resection Versus Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients
Bismuth, H., Chiche, L., Adam, R., Castaing, D., Diamond, T., & Dennison, A. (1993) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199308000-00005 · Cited by 865
Poon, R. T.-P., Fan, S. T., Lo, C. M., Liu, C. L., & Wong, J. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200203000-00009 · Cited by 844
Sangiovanni, A., Del Ninno, E., Fasani, P., De Fazio, C., Ronchi, G., Romeo, R., Morabito, A., de Franchis, R., & Colombo, M. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.049 · Cited by 600
Melendez, J. A., Arslan, V., Fischer, M. E., Wuest, D., Jarnagin, W. R., Fong, Y., & Blumgart, L. H. (1998) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00240-3 · Cited by 576
Cited by
de Haas, R. J., Lim, C., Bhangui, P., Salloum, C., Compagnon, P., Feray, C., Calderaro, J., Luciani, A., & Azoulay, D. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29468 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cherqui, D., Laurent, A., Mocellin, N., Tayar, C., Luciani, A., Van Nhieu, J. T., Decaens, T., Hurtova, M., Memeo, R., Mallat, A., & Duvoux, C.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 250
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 738-746
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006053115
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 13.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver Resection for Transplantable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Long-Term Survival and Role of Secondary Liver Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bd582b
- The paper
- Cherqui, D., Laurent, A., Mocellin, N., Tayar, C., Luciani, A., Van Nhieu, J. T., Decaens, T., Hurtova, M., Memeo, R., Mallat, A., & Duvoux, C. (2009). Liver Resection for Transplantable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Long-Term Survival and Role of Secondary Liver Transplantation. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bd582b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.