Cited by 129Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

The human amylin analog, pramlintide, corrects postprandial hyperglucagonemia in patients with type 1 diabetes

Fineman, M.S., Koda, J.E., Shen, L.Z., Strobel, S.A., Maggs, D.G., Weyer, C., Kolterman, O.G.·2002·Metabolism

Abstract

Mealtime amylin replacement with the human amylin analog pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy improves postprandial glycemia and long-term glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. Preclinical animal studies indicate that these complementary effects may result from at least 2 independent mechanisms: a slowing of nutrient delivery to the small intestine and a suppression of nutrient-stimulated glucagon secretion. The former effect of pramlintide has previously been demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes. The present studies characterize the effect of pramlintide on postprandial glucagon secretion in this patient population. Plasma glucagon and glucose concentrations were measured before and after a standardized liquid meal in 2 separate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of pramlintide administration to patients with type 1 diabetes. In a 2-day crossover study, 18 patients received a 5-hour intravenous infusion of pramlintide (25 microg/h or 50 microg/h) or placebo in addition to subcutaneous (SC) insulin injections. In a 14-day parallel-group study, 84 patients received SC injections of 30, 100, or 300 microg of pramlintide or placebo 3 times daily in addition to SC injections of insulin. In both studies plasma glucagon concentrations increased in response to the meal in the placebo-plus-insulin group but not in any of the pramlintide-treated groups (all pramlintide treatment arms v placebo, P <.05). We conclude that mealtime amylin replacement wit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/meta.2002.32022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fineman, M. S., Koda, J. E., Shen, L. Z., Strobel, S. A., Maggs, D. G., Weyer, C., & Kolterman, O. G.
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
636-641
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055928432
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
pramlintide, amylin analogues, type 1 diabetes, glucagon secretion, insulin therapy, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amyloid, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Double-Blind Method, Fasting, Female, Food, Glucagon, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Kinetics, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Islet Amyloid Polypeptide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review