The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High intratumoural accumulation of stealth® liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in glioblastomas and in metastatic brain tumours
Open accessAbstract
The blood-brain barrier is a major obstacle for the chemotherapeutic drugs to effectively reach primary or secondary brain tumours. Stealth liposomal drugs are highly accumulated in tumoural tissues. In the present study we investigated the relative accumulation of(99m)Tc-DTPA radiolabelled stealth liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in 10 patients with metastatic brain tumours and five patients with brain glioblastoma undergoing radiotherapy. Patients with metastatic brain lesions were treated with 10 consecutive fractions of radiotherapy (whole brain, 3 Gy/fraction, day 1-12) followed by a booster dose of 9 Gy (3 Gy/fraction, day 21-23). Caelyx, at a dose of 25 mg mg(-2)was given on day 1 and on day 21. Radiolabelled Caelyx accumulation was 13-19 times higher in the glioblastomas and 7-13 times higher in the metastatic lesions, as compared to the normal brain. The drug accumulation in the tumoural areas was 40-60% of the accumulation in the bone marrow of the skull bones. The normal brain radioactivity was <4% of the bone marrow, confirming an important shielding effect of the blood-brain barrier in the normal but not in the tumoural tissue. Four of 10 patients with metastatic lesions showed a complete response in CT-scan performed 2 months following therapy. There was no severe toxicity related to radiotherapy or to chemotherapy noted. It is concluded that stealth liposomal drugs selectively overcome the blood-brain barrier in the tumoural areas. The clinical importance of this observation is now under investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.108 · Cited by 5,873
Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin: Review of Animal and Human Studies
Gabizon, A., Shmeeda, H., & Barenholz, Y. (2003) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002 · Cited by 1,634
Nanosuspensions in drug delivery
Rabinow, B. E. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1494 · Cited by 1,524
Inhibition of B Cell Receptor Signaling by Ibrutinib in Primary CNS Lymphoma
Lionakis, M. S., Dunleavy, K., Roschewski, M., Widemann, B. C., Butman, J. A., Schmitz, R., Yang, Y., Cole, D. E., Melani, C., Higham, C. S., et al. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.04.012 · Cited by 508
Hersh, A. M., Alomari, S., & Tyler, B. M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23084153 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Koukourakis, M. I., Koukouraki, S., Fezoulidis, I., Kelekis, N., Kyrias, G., Archimandritis, S., & Karkavitsas, N.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1281-1286
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W1512493964
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High intratumoural accumulation of stealth® liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in glioblastomas and in metastatic brain tumours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1459
- The paper
- Koukourakis, M. I., Koukouraki, S., Fezoulidis, I., Kelekis, N., Kyrias, G., Archimandritis, S., & Karkavitsas, N. (2000). High intratumoural accumulation of stealth® liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in glioblastomas and in metastatic brain tumours. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.