The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of annual screening for lung cancer by low-dose computed tomography (CT) and the characteristics of identified lung cancers. Subjects consisted of 5483 general population aged 40-74 years, who received initial CT scans in 1996, followed by repeat annual scans for most subjects in 1997 and 1998, with a total of 13 786 scans taken during 1996-1998. Work-up examinations for patients with suspicious lesions were conducted using diagnostic CTs. The initial screening in 1996 detected suspicious nodules in 279 (5.1%) of 5483 subjects, and 22 (8%) were confirmed surgically to have lung cancer. Corresponding figures in 1997 and 1998 screening studies were 173 (3.9%) of 4425 and 25 (14%) of 173, and 136 (3.5%) of 3878 and 9 (7%) of 136, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting surgically confirmed lung cancer were 55% (22/40) and 95% (4960/5199) in 1996 and 83% (25/30) and 97% (4113/4252) in 1997 screening, respectively. 88% (55/60) of lung cancers identified on screening and surgically confirmed were AJCC stage IA. Our trial allowed detection of nearly 11 times the expected annual number of early lung cancers. Repeat CT allowed the detection of more aggressive, rapidly growing lung cancers, compared to those in the initial screening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2007) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x · Cited by 1,336
Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer
Patz, E. F., Pinsky, P., Gatsonis, C., Sicks, J. D., Kramer, B. S., Tammemägi, M. C., Chiles, C., Black, W. C., & Aberle, D. R. (2014) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12738 · Cited by 776
Li, Q., Sone, S., & Doi, K. (2003) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1581411 · Cited by 349
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sone, S., Li, F., Yang, Z.-G., Honda, T., Maruyama, Y., Takashima, S., Hasegawa, M., Kawakami, S., Kubo, K., Haniuda, M., & Yamanda, T.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-32
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2009551160
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1531
- The paper
- Sone, S., Li, F., Yang, Z.-G., Honda, T., Maruyama, Y., Takashima, S., Hasegawa, M., Kawakami, S., Kubo, K., Haniuda, M., & Yamanda, T. (2001). Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.