The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pancreatic tumours: molecular pathways implicated in ductal cancer are involved in ampullary but not in exocrine nonductal or endocrine tumorigenesis
Open accessAbstract
Alterations of K- ras, p53, p16 and DPC4/Smad4 characterize pancreatic ductal cancer (PDC). Reports of inactivation of these latter two genes in pancreatic endocrine tumours (PET) suggest that common molecular pathways are involved in the tumorigenesis of pancreatic exocrine and endocrine epithelia. We characterized 112 primary pancreatic tumours for alterations in p16 and DPC4 and immunohistochemical expression of DPC4. The cases included 34 PDC, 10 intraductal papillary-mucinous tumours (IPMT), 6 acinar carcinomas (PAC), 5 solid-pseudopapillary tumours (SPT), 16 ampulla of Vater cancers (AVC) and 41 PET. All tumours were also presently or previously analysed for K- ras and p53 mutations and allelic loss at 9p, 17p and 18q. Alterations in K- ras, p53, p16 and DPC4 were found in 82%, 53%, 38% and 9% of PDC, respectively and in 47%, 60%, 25% and 6% of AVC. Alterations in these genes were virtually absent in PET, PAC or SPT, while in IPMT only K- ras mutations were present (30%). Positive immunostaining confirmed the absence of DPC4 alterations in all IPMT, SPT, PAC and PET, while 47% of PDC and 38% of AVC were immunonegative. These data suggest that pancreatic exocrine and endocrine tumourigenesis involves different genetic targets and that among exocrine pancreatic neoplasms, only ductal and ampullary cancers share common molecular events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DPC4 , A Candidate Tumor Suppressor Gene at Human Chromosome 18q21.1
Hahn, S. A., Schutte, M., Shamsul Hoque, A. T. M., Moskaluk, C. A., da Costa, L. T., Rozenblum, E., Weinstein, C. L., Fischer, A., Yeo, C. J., Hruban, R. H., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5247.350 · Cited by 2,337
Cited by
Romagosa, C., Simonetti, S., López-Vicente, L., Mazo, A., Lleonart, M. E., Castellvi, J., & Ramon y Cajal, S. (2011) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2010.614 · Cited by 509
Abraham, S. C., Klimstra, D. S., Wilentz, R. E., Yeo, C. J., Conlon, K., Brennan, M., Cameron, J. L., Wu, T.-T., & Hruban, R. H. (2002) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62563-1 · Cited by 488
Andea, A., Sarkar, F., & Adsay, V. N. (2003) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1097/01.mp.0000087422.24733.62 · Cited by 290
Genetic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma
Abraham, S. C., Wu, T.-T., Hruban, R. H., Lee, J.-H., Yeo, C. J., Conlon, K., Brennan, M., Cameron, J. L., & Klimstra, D. S. (2002) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64917-6 · Cited by 277
Molecular prognostic markers in pancreatic cancer: A systematic review
Garcea, G., Neal, C. P., Pattenden, C. J., Steward, W. P., & Berry, D. P. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.044 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, P. S., Orlandini, S., Zamboni, G., Capelli, P., Rigaud, G., Falconi, M., Bassi, C., Lemoine, N. R., & Scarpa, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-262
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2045039141
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pancreatic tumours: molecular pathways implicated in ductal cancer are involved in ampullary but not in exocrine nonductal or endocrine tumorigenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1567
- The paper
- Moore, P. S., Orlandini, S., Zamboni, G., Capelli, P., Rigaud, G., Falconi, M., Bassi, C., Lemoine, N. R., & Scarpa, A. (2001). Pancreatic tumours: molecular pathways implicated in ductal cancer are involved in ampullary but not in exocrine nonductal or endocrine tumorigenesis. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.