Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of pancreatic cystic lesions: a prospective multicenter validation study in patients with definite diagnosis
Abstract
Background Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) enables observation of the inner wall of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) during an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). This study prospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of nCLE for large, single, noncommunicating PCLs using surgical histopathology or EUS-FNA cytohistopathology as a reference diagnosis. Methods From April 2013 to March 2016, consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA of indeterminate PCLs without evidence of malignancy or chronic pancreatitis were prospectively enrolled at five centers. EUS-FNA and nCLE were performed and cystic fluid was aspirated for cytohistopathological and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) analysis. The diagnostic performance of nCLE was assessed against the reference standard and compared with that of EUS and CEA. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01563133). Results 206 patients underwent nCLE and 78 PCLs (mean size 40 mm, range 20 – 110 mm) had reference diagnoses (53 premalignant and 25 benign PCLs). Post-procedure pancreatitis occurred in 1.3 % of the patients. nCLE was conclusive in 71 of the 78 cases (91 %). The sensitivies and specifities of nCLE for the diagnosis of serous cystadenoma, mucinous PCL, and premalignant PCL were all ≥ 0.95 (with 95 % confidence interval from 0.85 to 1.0). The AUROC was significantly larger for nCLE than for CEA or EUS. Conclusions nCLE had excellent diagnostic performance that surpassed that of CEA and EUS for the diagnosis of large, single, noncommunicating PCLs. The nCLE procedure should be considered in patients with indeterminate PCLs to ensure a more specific diagnosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have shown good sensitivity with excellent specificity for differentiating benign cysts that require no follow-up from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
“Studies have shown good sensitivity with excellent specificity for differentiating between benign cysts that require no follow-up and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.44–46”
From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas
Tanaka, M., Fernández-del Castillo, C., Adsay, V., Chari, S., Falconi, M., Jang, J.-Y., Kimura, W., Levy, P., Pitman, M. B., Schmidt, C. M., et al. (2012) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2012.04.004 · Cited by 2,354 · see citing works
Springer, S., Wang, Y., Dal Molin, M., Masica, D. L., Jiao, Y., Kinde, I., Blackford, A., Raman, S. P., Wolfgang, C. L., Tomita, T., et al. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.041 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Early detection of pancreatic cancer
Pereira, S. P., Oldfield, L., Ney, A., Hart, P. A., Keane, M. G., Pandol, S. J., Li, D., Greenhalf, W., Jeon, C. Y., Koay, E. J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30416-9 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Jiang, J., Chao, W.-L., Culp, S., & Krishna, S. G. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15092410 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
A prospective trial of CONfocal endomicroscopy in CYSTic lesions of the pancreas: CONCYST-01
Keane, M. G., Wehnert, N., Perez-Machado, M., Fusai, G. K., Thorburn, D., Oppong, K. W., Carroll, N., Metz, A. J., & Pereira, S. P. (2019) · Endoscopy International Open · doi:10.1055/a-0957-2976 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Napoleon, B., Palazzo, M., Lemaistre, A.-I., Caillol, F., Palazzo, L., Aubert, A., Buscail, L., Maire, F., Morellon, B. M., Pujol, B., & Giovannini, M.
- Affiliations
- Département de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay GDS, Lyon, France
- Hôpital Beaujon (FR)
- Eurofins (France) (FR)
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR)
- Clinique du Trocadéro, Paris, France
- Hôpital Rangueil (FR)
- Cabinet d’Anatomo-cyto-pathologie, Technipath, Limonest, France
- Hôpital Privé Jean Mermo (FR)
- Venue
- Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2018-10-22
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 825-835
- ISSN
- 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8812
- OpenAlex
- W2896946021
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Keywords
- needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, pancreatic cysts, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, serous cystadenoma, mucinous pancreatic cysts, carcinoembryonic antigen, diagnostic accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Needles, Pancreatic Cyst, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Microscopy, Confocal, Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review