Cited by 30Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

Acute Effects of Different Training Loads on Affective Responses in Resistance-trained Men

Ribeiro, Alex S., dos Santos, Erick D., Nunes, João Pedro, Schoenfeld, Brad J.·2019·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the acute effects of different training loads on ratings of perceived exertion and discomfort and feelings of pleasure/displeasure in resistance-trained men. Twelve resistance-trained men (26.7±3.5 years, 85.1±17.5 kg, and 174. 9±9.9 cm) performed 3 sets of the bench press, squat on a hack machine, and lat pulldown, until volitional concentric failure in two separate conditions: a moderate load (MOD) consisting of a relative load of 8–12 repetitions maximum (RM), and a light load (LIT) consisting of a relative load of 25–30RM. The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), session rating of perceived discomfort (sRPD), and session pleasure/displeasure feelings (sPDF) were assessed after 15 min after the ending of each session. A randomized, counterbalanced, crossover study was performed with 48 h recovery afforded between sessions. Differences between conditions were observed for sRPE and sRPD, in which scores for LIT were greater than MOD (sRPE: MOD=5.5±1.0 vs. LIT=6.4±0.7; sRPD: MOD=6.7±1.7 vs. LIT=8.7±1.0). For sPDF, MOD reported feelings of pleasure (1.2), whereas the LIT presented a feeling of displeasure (–2.3). Results suggest that resistance training performed with a light load until failure induces higher degrees of effort, discomfort and displeasure compared to a moderate load.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-0997-6680

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ribeiro, A. S., dos Santos, E. D., Nunes, J. P., & Schoenfeld, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Norte do Paraná (BR)
  • Center for Research in Health Sciences, University of Northern Paraná, Londrina, Brazil
  • Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
  • Lehman College (US)
Corresponding author
Nunes, João Pedro
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2019-09-09
Volume
40
Issue
13
Pages
850-855
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2973014004
Cited by
30
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
resistance training, training load, perceived exertion, perceived discomfort, pleasure and displeasure, acute exercise effects, resistance-trained men, bench press, squatting, repetitions to failure, relative load
MeSH terms
Adult, Physical Exertion, Humans, Male, Perception, Weight Lifting, Cross-Over Studies, Resistance Training, Young Adult, Pleasure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review