Cited by 404Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Neither load nor systemic hormones determine resistance training-mediated hypertrophy or strength gains in resistance-trained young men

Open access
Morton, Robert W., Oikawa, Sara Y., Wavell, Christopher G., Mazara, Nicole, McGlory, Chris, Quadrilatero, Joe, Baechler, Brittany L., Baker, Steven K. +1 more·2016·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

We reported, using a unilateral resistance training (RT) model, that training with high or low loads (mass per repetition) resulted in similar muscle hypertrophy and strength improvements in RT-naïve subjects. Here we aimed to determine whether the same was true in men with previous RT experience using a whole-body RT program and whether postexercise systemic hormone concentrations were related to changes in hypertrophy and strength. Forty-nine resistance-trained men (23 ± 1 yr, mean ± SE) performed 12 wk of whole-body RT. Subjects were randomly allocated into a higher-repetition (HR) group who lifted loads of ∼30-50% of their maximal strength (1RM) for 20-25 repetitions/set (n = 24) or a lower-repetition (LR) group (∼75-90% 1RM, 8-12 repetitions/set, n = 25), with all sets being performed to volitional failure. Skeletal muscle biopsies, strength testing, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans, and acute changes in systemic hormone concentrations were examined pretraining and posttraining. In response to RT, 1RM strength increased for all exercises in both groups (P < 0.01), with only the change in bench press being significantly different between groups (HR, 9 ± 1, vs. LR, 14 ± 1 kg, P = 0.012). Fat- and bone-free (lean) body mass and type I and type II muscle fiber cross-sectional area increased following training (P < 0.01) with no significant differences between groups. No significant correlations between the acute postexercise rise in any purported anabolic hormone and the change in strength or hypertrophy were found. In congruence with our previous work, acute postexercise systemic hormonal rises are not related to or in any way indicative of RT-mediated gains in muscle mass or strength. Our data show that in resistance-trained individuals, load, when exercises are performed to volitional failure, does not dictate hypertrophy or, for the most part, strength gains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00154.2016

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These pathways do not fully explain how high mechanical tension can directly influence transcriptional programs linked to growth.

    “Although these pathways are clearly relevant, they do not fully explain how high mechanical tension can directly influence transcriptional programs linked to growth [144,203].”

    From Ribosome Biogenesis as a Putative Bottleneck to Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Mechanisms, Human Evidence, and Practical Modulators (2026) · cites this paper as [144]

    The NEW & NOTEWORTHY section says the study's data suggest that neither load nor systemic hormone concentrations determine resistance-training hypertrophy, supporting the broad point that those factors do not fully explain growth. The paper does not address how high mechanical tension directly influences growth-related transcriptional programs; searches for mechanical tension, transcription, and gene expression did not locate that mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Resistance-trained individuals show increases in strength when training with very light loads, albeit to a lesser extent than with heavy loads.

    “Even resistance-trained individuals show increases in strength when training with very light loads, albeit to a lesser extent than with the use of heavy loads [16,17].”

    From Loading recommendations for muscle strength, hypertrophy, and local endurance: a re-examination of the repetition continuum. (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion reports that resistance-trained participants gained strength with both lower and higher loads. Gains did not differ for leg press, knee extension, or shoulder press; only bench-press gains were greater with heavier loads (15% versus 9%). Thus, the claim that lighter loads generally produced lesser gains overstates this study's findings. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both low-load (e.g., 30% 1RM) and high-load (e.g., 80% 1RM) training can stimulate equivalent macroscopic muscle growth when sets are performed with sufficient effort and proximity to failure.

    “both low-load (e.g., 30% 1RM) and high-load (e.g., 80% 1RM) training can stimulate equivalent macroscopic muscle growth when sets are performed with sufficient effort and proximity to failure [143,144].”
  • Morton et al. found that training with 8 to 12RM vs. 20 to 25RM produced significant changes in lean body mass and type I and type II muscle fiber cross-sectional area of the vastus lateralis in resistance-trained men following a 12-week total body training program, with no observed differences between the groups.

    “Likewise, Morton et al. [16] found that training with 8 to 12RM vs. 20 to 25RM produced significant changes in lean body mass and type I and type II muscle fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vastus lateralis in a group of resistance-trained men following a 12-week total body training program, with no observed differences between the groups.”
  • Regarding longitudinal research, some studies show a fiber type specific response while others do not.

    “Regarding longitudinal research, some studies show a fiber type specific response [70,71,72] while others do not [16,73,74].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morton, R. W., Oikawa, S. Y., Wavell, C. G., Mazara, N., McGlory, C., Quadrilatero, J., Baechler, B. L., Baker, S. K., & Phillips, S. M.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Stuart M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2016-05-12
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
129-138
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2351799718
Cited by
404
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 14
FWCI
57.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science and Engineering Council of Canada (RGPIN-2015-04613)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
resistance training, muscle hypertrophy, strength gain, training load, resistance-trained men, anabolic hormones, lean body mass, muscle fiber cross-sectional area, unilateral training
MeSH terms
Adult, Hormones, Humans, Hypertrophy, Male, Weight Lifting, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review