Cited by 29AI in cancer detectionPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Accurate prediction of histological grading of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia using deep learning

Schulz, Dominik, Heilmaier, Markus, Phillip, Veit, Treiber, Matthias, Mayr, Ulrich, Lahmer, Tobias, Mueller, Julius, Demir, Ihsan Ekin +4 more·2023·Endoscopy

Abstract

Background Risk stratification and recommendation for surgery for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) are currently based on consensus guidelines. Risk stratification from presurgery histology is only potentially decisive owing to the low sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration. In this study, we developed and validated a deep learning-based method to distinguish between IPMN with low grade dysplasia and IPMN with high grade dysplasia/invasive carcinoma using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images. Methods For model training, we acquired a total of 3355 EUS images from 43 patients who underwent pancreatectomy from March 2015 to August 2021. All patients had histologically proven IPMN. We used transfer learning to fine-tune a convolutional neural network and to classify “low grade IPMN” from “high grade IPMN/invasive carcinoma.” Our test set consisted of 1823 images from 27 patients, recruiting 11 patients retrospectively, 7 patients prospectively, and 9 patients externally. We compared our results with the prediction based on international consensus guidelines. Results Our approach could classify low grade from high grade/invasive carcinoma in the test set with an accuracy of 99.6 % (95 %CI 99.5 %–99.9 %). Our deep learning model achieved superior accuracy in prediction of the histological outcome compared with any individual guideline, which have accuracies between 51.8 % (95 %CI 31.9 %–71.3 %) and 70.4 % (95 %CI 49.8–86.2). Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated that deep learning in IPMN-EUS images can predict the histological outcome with high accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-1971-1274

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulz, D., Heilmaier, M., Phillip, V., Treiber, M., Mayr, U., Lahmer, T., Mueller, J., Demir, I. E., Friess, H., Reichert, M., Schmid, R. M., & Abdelhafez, M.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Venue
Endoscopy
Published
2022-11-02
Volume
55
Issue
05
Pages
415-422
ISSN
  • 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8812
OpenAlex
W4307977696
Cited by
29
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe (Max-Eder Program 111273 and #70114328)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-SFB1321 (Project-ID 329628492))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, histological grading, endoscopic ultrasound, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, pancreatic cancer, invasive carcinoma, low-grade dysplasia, risk stratification, pancreatic resection
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Retrospective Studies, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review