Accurate prediction of histological grading of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia using deep learning
Abstract
Background Risk stratification and recommendation for surgery for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) are currently based on consensus guidelines. Risk stratification from presurgery histology is only potentially decisive owing to the low sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration. In this study, we developed and validated a deep learning-based method to distinguish between IPMN with low grade dysplasia and IPMN with high grade dysplasia/invasive carcinoma using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images. Methods For model training, we acquired a total of 3355 EUS images from 43 patients who underwent pancreatectomy from March 2015 to August 2021. All patients had histologically proven IPMN. We used transfer learning to fine-tune a convolutional neural network and to classify “low grade IPMN” from “high grade IPMN/invasive carcinoma.” Our test set consisted of 1823 images from 27 patients, recruiting 11 patients retrospectively, 7 patients prospectively, and 9 patients externally. We compared our results with the prediction based on international consensus guidelines. Results Our approach could classify low grade from high grade/invasive carcinoma in the test set with an accuracy of 99.6 % (95 %CI 99.5 %–99.9 %). Our deep learning model achieved superior accuracy in prediction of the histological outcome compared with any individual guideline, which have accuracies between 51.8 % (95 %CI 31.9 %–71.3 %) and 70.4 % (95 %CI 49.8–86.2). Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated that deep learning in IPMN-EUS images can predict the histological outcome with high accuracy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is estimated that 5% of patients with IPMNs have concomitant adenocarcinoma elsewhere in the pancreas.
“Conversely, a negative biopsy or cytology does not rule out the presence of a high-risk lesion, and it is estimated that 5% of patients with IPMNs have concomitant adenocarcinoma elsewhere in the pancreas [18,19].”
From Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Adenocarcinoma (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms
The European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316027 · Cited by 1,417 · see citing works
Deep learning for colorectal polyp detection: time for clinical implementation?
Ahmad, O. F. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30431-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yao, L., Zhang, Z., Keles, E., Yazici, C., Tirkes, T., & Bagci, U. (2023) · Current Opinion in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mog.0000000000000966 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review
Podină, N., Gheorghe, E. C., Constantin, A., Cazacu, I., Croitoru, V., Gheorghe, C., Balaban, D. V., Jinga, M., Țieranu, C. G., & Săftoiu, A. (2025) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1002/ueg2.12723 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Jiang, J., Chao, W.-L., Culp, S., & Krishna, S. G. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15092410 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schulz, D., Heilmaier, M., Phillip, V., Treiber, M., Mayr, U., Lahmer, T., Mueller, J., Demir, I. E., Friess, H., Reichert, M., Schmid, R. M., & Abdelhafez, M.
- Affiliations
- TUM Klinikum (DE)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- ORCID
- Venue
- Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2022-11-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 415-422
- ISSN
- 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8812
- OpenAlex
- W4307977696
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Krebshilfe (Max-Eder Program 111273 and #70114328)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-SFB1321 (Project-ID 329628492))
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, histological grading, endoscopic ultrasound, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, pancreatic cancer, invasive carcinoma, low-grade dysplasia, risk stratification, pancreatic resection
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Retrospective Studies, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review