Cited by 9Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Deep learning for colorectal polyp detection: time for clinical implementation?

Ahmad, Omer F·2020·The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30431-5

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, O. F.
Affiliations
Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (GB)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Omer F
Venue
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
330-331
ISSN
  • 2468-1156 (ISSN-L)
  • 2468-1253
OpenAlex
W3001061830
Cited by
9
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
colorectal polyp detection, computer-aided detection, deep learning, colonoscopy, adenoma detection, interval colorectal cancer, clinical implementation, colorectal cancer prevention
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Adenoma, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Humans, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review